- Users - libvirt List Archives

best backup strategy for full backup's
by Michael Niehren 10 Mar '25

10 Mar '25

Hi together, actually i only do full-backup's of my virtual machines. I use the for the backup the "old" strategy: - virsh snapshot-create-as $vmname overlay --disk-only --atomic --no-metadata --quiesce - copy the qcow2 image file - virsh blockcommit $vmname $device --active --wait --pivot - the guest agent in the VM got's an 2 seconds freeze/thaw intervall Now i want to switch to the new strategy with "backup-begin". - virsh backup-begin $vmname - the guest agent does not got an freez/thaw signal As the guest agent got's no signal, is the backup over "backup-begin" still consistent ? Or do i have to be consistent to send an virsh domfsfreeze $vmname before starting the backup and an virsh domfsthaw $vmname it it is finished ? If so, the time intervall between freeze/thaw would be on an huge disk much more then 2 secords. So, is the old method currently still the better way, if only doing full-backup's ? best regards, Michael

2 6

So hey let's talk about this nftables ordering situation.
by robinleepowell＠gmail.com 25 Feb '25

25 Feb '25

So I, like many other people, have hit problems with nftables ordering, as has been discussed on this mailing list MANY TIMES. This whole thing seemed ridiculous so I asked the nftables people about what one is *supposed* to do in this situation. It turns out that the standard solution is for libvirt's nftables rules to set a packet mark (there's a collision possibility here but it's a 32 bit integer if you pick one at random it shouldn't be a problem) and then the user adds a rule to exclude packets with that mark from any reject rules they might have, or explicitly accept marked packets in their own chains, or whatever. It's not *as nice* as the iptables situation, but having documentation that says "if you're using nftables make sure that packets with mark 79892 are accepted in all your chains" is quite straightforward compared to the current situation of "LOL good luck". (I'm not blaming anyone there!, the current situation is impossible for libvirt to navigate and it's not anyone's fault.) If y'all don't like that, what's working excellently for me is adding `iifname "virbr*" accept` to my rule chain. FWIW. It was very hard to navigate through this situation because there's no documentation that this problem even exists. My suggestion is to describe the situation at https://libvirt.org/firewall.html and suggest the virbr* fix, and down the road maybe look at this mark thing. I'd like to help. I'm happy to write up issues for this, and I'm happy to write the updates to the firewall docs; just tell me what you'd like me to do.

4 8

nftables rules (DNS, DHCP, etc) not being written on Fedora 41
by robinleepowell＠gmail.com 21 Feb '25

21 Feb '25

I do not think this is any of the similar issues that have been posted to this list; I've checked. In particular, this in *NOT* an issue with nft rules precedence; the rules are simply not being written by libvirt. I'm running vagrant which is running libvirt on a Fedora 41 host. I do not think this is a vagrant problem, but if people want me to run virsh commands directly I certainly can. Anyway, vagrant was failing until I noticed that the default for /etc/libvirt/network.conf is now nftables, which I did not have set up. When I set `firewall_backend = "iptables"`, everything worked fine. I want to emphasize that: the same vagrant / libvirt setup *was* working with iptables. But I took that as a sign that it was time to move to nftables, so I moved everything on this host and stuff is back to working. But libvirt just isn't writing out the right nft rules. Like, at all. Here's the network vagrant creates: $ sudo virsh net-dumpxml vagrant-libvirt <network connections='1' ipv6='yes'> <name>vagrant-libvirt</name> <uuid>b2d93ef4-b305-4382-a380-c1eca92d8ebd</uuid> <forward mode='nat'> <nat> <port start='1024' end='65535'/> </nat> </forward> <bridge name='virbr1' stp='on' delay='0'/> <mac address='52:54:00:63:d3:f6'/> <ip address='192.168.121.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'> <dhcp> <range start='192.168.121.1' end='192.168.121.254'/> </dhcp> </ip> </network> And here's the *entire* libvirt-related ruleset in nftables: table ip libvirt_network { chain forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; counter packets 0 bytes 0 jump guest_cross counter packets 0 bytes 0 jump guest_input counter packets 0 bytes 0 jump guest_output } chain guest_output { ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 iif "virbr1" counter packets 0 bytes 0 accept iif "virbr1" counter packets 0 bytes 0 reject } chain guest_input { oif "virbr1" ip daddr 192.168.121.0/24 ct state established,related counter packets 0 bytes 0 accept oif "virbr1" counter packets 0 bytes 0 reject } chain guest_cross { iif "virbr1" oif "virbr1" counter packets 0 bytes 0 accept } chain guest_nat { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr 224.0.0.0/24 counter packets 1 bytes 187 return ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr 255.255.255.255 counter packets 0 bytes 0 return meta l4proto tcp ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.121.0/24 counter packets 0 bytes 0 masquerade to :1024-65535 meta l4proto udp ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.121.0/24 counter packets 0 bytes 0 masquerade to :1024-65535 ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.121.0/24 counter packets 0 bytes 0 masquerade } } table ip6 libvirt_network { chain forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; counter packets 0 bytes 0 jump guest_cross counter packets 0 bytes 0 jump guest_input counter packets 0 bytes 0 jump guest_output } chain guest_output { iif "virbr1" counter packets 0 bytes 0 reject } chain guest_input { oif "virbr1" counter packets 0 bytes 0 reject } chain guest_cross { iif "virbr1" oif "virbr1" counter packets 0 bytes 0 accept } chain guest_nat { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; } } Here's some log output (I have virtnetworkd running with -v): $ sudo journalctl -u virtnetworkd.service | grep -i nft [snip] Feb 20 21:36:42 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: using firewall_backend: 'nftables' Feb 20 21:36:46 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft list table ip libvirt_network' Feb 20 21:36:46 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft list table ip6 libvirt_network' Feb 20 21:36:46 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_output iif virbr1 counter reject' Feb 20 21:36:46 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_input oif virbr1 counter reject' Feb 20 21:36:46 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_cross iif virbr1 oif virbr1 counter accept' Feb 20 21:36:46 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip6 libvirt_network guest_output iif virbr1 counter reject' Feb 20 21:36:46 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip6 libvirt_network guest_input oif virbr1 counter reject' Feb 20 21:36:46 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip6 libvirt_network guest_cross iif virbr1 oif virbr1 counter accept' Feb 20 21:36:47 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_output ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 iif virbr1 counter accept' Feb 20 21:36:47 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_input oif virbr1 ip daddr 192.168.121.0/24 ct state related,established counter accept' Feb 20 21:36:47 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_nat ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr '!=' 192.168.121.0/24 counter masquerade' Feb 20 21:36:47 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_nat meta l4proto udp ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr '!=' 192.168.121.0/24 counter masquerade to :1024-65535' Feb 20 21:36:47 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_nat meta l4proto tcp ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr '!=' 192.168.121.0/24 counter masquerade to :1024-65535' Feb 20 21:36:47 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_nat ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr 255.255.255.255/32 counter return' Feb 20 21:36:47 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_nat ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr 224.0.0.0/24 counter return' So it's not like trying to create the rules and failing, that I can see; it just isn't trying. To clarify this setup appears to be missing every rule that would be needed for DHCPv4 and DNS to work. Like https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/88#note_694493261 shows rules for udp 67 and 53 that are just 100% not being created at all. I have no idea what's going wrong here or even where to look; the code at https://lists.libvirt.org/archives/list/devel@lists.libvirt.org/thread/GT75… sure *looks like* it should be unconditionally adding those rules. Help?

2 2

nftables rules (DNS, DHCP, etc) not being written on Fedora 41
by Robin Lee Powell 21 Feb '25

21 Feb '25

I do not think this is any of the similar issues that have been posted to this list; I've checked. In particular, this in *NOT* an issue with nft rules precedence; the rules are simply not being written by libvirt. I'm running vagrant which is running libvirt on a Fedora 41 host. I do not think this is a vagrant problem, but if people want me to run virsh commands directly I certainly can. Anyway, vagrant was failing until I noticed that the default for /etc/libvirt/network.conf is now nftables, which I did not have set up. When I set `firewall_backend = "iptables"`, everything worked fine. I want to emphasize that: the same vagrant / libvirt setup *was* working with iptables. But I took that as a sign that it was time to move to nftables, so I moved everything on this host and stuff is back to working. But libvirt just isn't writing out the right nft rules. Like, at all. Here's the network vagrant creates: $ sudo virsh net-dumpxml vagrant-libvirt <network connections='1' ipv6='yes'> <name>vagrant-libvirt</name> <uuid>b2d93ef4-b305-4382-a380-c1eca92d8ebd</uuid> <forward mode='nat'> <nat> <port start='1024' end='65535'/> </nat> </forward> <bridge name='virbr1' stp='on' delay='0'/> <mac address='52:54:00:63:d3:f6'/> <ip address='192.168.121.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'> <dhcp> <range start='192.168.121.1' end='192.168.121.254'/> </dhcp> </ip> </network> And here's the *entire* libvirt-related ruleset in nftables: table ip libvirt_network { chain forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; counter packets 0 bytes 0 jump guest_cross counter packets 0 bytes 0 jump guest_input counter packets 0 bytes 0 jump guest_output } chain guest_output { ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 iif "virbr1" counter packets 0 bytes 0 accept iif "virbr1" counter packets 0 bytes 0 reject } chain guest_input { oif "virbr1" ip daddr 192.168.121.0/24 ct state established,related counter packets 0 bytes 0 accept oif "virbr1" counter packets 0 bytes 0 reject } chain guest_cross { iif "virbr1" oif "virbr1" counter packets 0 bytes 0 accept } chain guest_nat { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr 224.0.0.0/24 counter packets 1 bytes 187 return ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr 255.255.255.255 counter packets 0 bytes 0 return meta l4proto tcp ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.121.0/24 counter packets 0 bytes 0 masquerade to :1024-65535 meta l4proto udp ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.121.0/24 counter packets 0 bytes 0 masquerade to :1024-65535 ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr != 192.168.121.0/24 counter packets 0 bytes 0 masquerade } } table ip6 libvirt_network { chain forward { type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept; counter packets 0 bytes 0 jump guest_cross counter packets 0 bytes 0 jump guest_input counter packets 0 bytes 0 jump guest_output } chain guest_output { iif "virbr1" counter packets 0 bytes 0 reject } chain guest_input { oif "virbr1" counter packets 0 bytes 0 reject } chain guest_cross { iif "virbr1" oif "virbr1" counter packets 0 bytes 0 accept } chain guest_nat { type nat hook postrouting priority srcnat; policy accept; } } Here's some log output (I have virtnetworkd running with -v): $ sudo journalctl -u virtnetworkd.service | grep -i nft [snip] Feb 20 21:36:42 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: using firewall_backend: 'nftables' Feb 20 21:36:46 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft list table ip libvirt_network' Feb 20 21:36:46 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft list table ip6 libvirt_network' Feb 20 21:36:46 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_output iif virbr1 counter reject' Feb 20 21:36:46 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_input oif virbr1 counter reject' Feb 20 21:36:46 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_cross iif virbr1 oif virbr1 counter accept' Feb 20 21:36:46 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip6 libvirt_network guest_output iif virbr1 counter reject' Feb 20 21:36:46 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip6 libvirt_network guest_input oif virbr1 counter reject' Feb 20 21:36:46 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip6 libvirt_network guest_cross iif virbr1 oif virbr1 counter accept' Feb 20 21:36:47 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_output ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 iif virbr1 counter accept' Feb 20 21:36:47 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_input oif virbr1 ip daddr 192.168.121.0/24 ct state related,established counter accept' Feb 20 21:36:47 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_nat ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr '!=' 192.168.121.0/24 counter masquerade' Feb 20 21:36:47 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_nat meta l4proto udp ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr '!=' 192.168.121.0/24 counter masquerade to :1024-65535' Feb 20 21:36:47 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_nat meta l4proto tcp ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr '!=' 192.168.121.0/24 counter masquerade to :1024-65535' Feb 20 21:36:47 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_nat ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr 255.255.255.255/32 counter return' Feb 20 21:36:47 stodi.digitalkingdom.org virtnetworkd[89119]: Applying 'nft -ae insert rule ip libvirt_network guest_nat ip saddr 192.168.121.0/24 ip daddr 224.0.0.0/24 counter return' So it's not like trying to create the rules and failing, that I can see; it just isn't trying. To clarify this setup appears to be missing every rule that would be needed for DHCPv4 and DNS to work. Like https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/88#note_694493261 shows rules for udp 67 and 53 that are just 100% not being created at all. I have no idea what's going wrong here or even where to look; the code at https://lists.libvirt.org/archives/list/devel@lists.libvirt.org/thread/GT75… sure *looks like* it should be unconditionally adding those rules. Help?

1 0

Re: SEV-SNP Libvirt Support
by Michal Prívozník 17 Feb '25

17 Feb '25

On 2/17/25 11:11, Paraskevas Nik wrote: > Hello Michael, > Thanks for responding. I have built the libvirt and and then used ninja > install to install it. Does this also installs the correct selinux labels? Depends, if you've passed "-Dsystem=true" to meson setup then it should replace the system binaries and thus SELinux might have the correct policy. But otherwise, I'd suggest 'meson dist && rpmbuild -ta ...' and then installing those RPMs. Michal

2 1

SEV-SNP Libvirt Support
by Paraskevas Nik 17 Feb '25

17 Feb '25

Hello, I am trying to build libvirt v10.5.0 to support SEV-SNP but when I run virsh domcapabilities I am getting <sev support=no>. If I install libvirt 8.0.0 using apt install libvirt-daemon-system qemu-kvm them sev shows as supported. Everything is enabled on the system about SEV, SEV-ES, SEV-SNP. Is there a specific build option to enable SEV? *# cat /sys/module/kvm_amd/parameters/sev* *Y* *CPU: AMD EPYC 9254* *# dmesg | grep -i sev* *[ 0.000000] SEV-SNP: RMP table physical range [0x000000002d500000 - 0x000000004ddfffff]* *[ 0.009021] SEV-SNP: Reserving start/end of RMP table on a 2MB boundary [0x000000002d400000]* *[ 11.184492] ccp 0000:01:00.5: sev enabled* *[ 12.664210] ccp 0000:01:00.5: SEV API:1.55 build:36* *[ 12.664217] ccp 0000:01:00.5: SEV-SNP API:1.55 build:36* *[ 12.671343] kvm_amd: SEV enabled (ASIDs 16 - 1006)* *[ 12.671345] kvm_amd: SEV-ES enabled (ASIDs 1 - 15)* *[ 12.671346] kvm_amd: SEV-SNP enabled (ASIDs 1 - 15)* *Linux kernel version: 6.12**Libvirt version: 10.5.0* *qemu-system-x86_64 version : 9.1.0* *If you need any other information please let me know.Cheers*

2 1

Re: Network denied access
by Rodrigo Prieto 12 Feb '25

12 Feb '25

Thank you for taking the time to respond. I want to mention that I don't speak English, and it's difficult for me to understand using a translator. In the file */etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf*, I have the following: access_drivers = [ "polkit" ] The *virtqemud* and *virtnetworkd* services are not installed. I used the version from the Debian 12 repositories. systemctl status virtnetworkd.socket Unit virtnetworkd.socket could not be found. systemctl status virtqemud.socket Unit virtqemud.socket could not be found. In the file */etc/libvirt/qemu.conf*, the default configuration is present. Best regards. El jue, 6 feb 2025 a las 20:48, Rodrigo Prieto (<rodrigoprieto2019(a)gmail.com>) escribió: > Thank you for taking the time to respond. I want to mention that I don't > speak English, and it's difficult for me to understand using a translator. > > In the file */etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf*, I have the following: > access_drivers = [ "polkit" ] > > > The *virtqemud* and *virtnetworkd* services are not installed. I used the > version from the Debian 12 repositories. > > systemctl status virtnetworkd.socket > Unit virtnetworkd.socket could not be found. > > systemctl status virtqemud.socket > Unit virtqemud.socket could not be found. > > In the file */etc/libvirt/qemu.conf*, the default configuration is > present. > > Best regards. > > El jue, 6 feb 2025 a las 12:55, Martin Kletzander (<mkletzan(a)redhat.com>) > escribió: > >> On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 03:34:03AM -0300, Rodrigo Prieto wrote: >> >Hello, >> > >> >I am configuring Polkit using an example I found on the web. It correctly >> >displays the assigned domain for a given user, but when I try to start >> the >> >VM, I get the following error: >> > >> >error: Failed to start domain 'debian12' >> >error: access denied: 'network' denied access >> > >> >Here is my configuration: >> > >> >polkit.addRule(function(action, subject) { >> > if (action.id == "org.libvirt.unix.manage" && >> > subject.user == "lolo") { >> > return polkit.Result.YES; >> > } >> >}); >> >polkit.addRule(function(action, subject) { >> > if (action.id.indexOf("org.libvirt.api.domain.") == 0 && >> > subject.user == "lolo") { >> > if (action.lookup("connect_driver") == 'QEMU' && >> > action.lookup("domain_name") == 'debian12') { >> > return polkit.Result.YES; >> > } else { >> > return polkit.Result.NO; >> > } >> > } >> >}); >> > >> >> So doing this allows you to do anything with debian12 domain on the QEMU >> connection driver. >> >> >To grant network access, I have to configure the following: >> > >> >polkit.addRule(function(action, subject) { >> > if (action.id.indexOf("org.libvirt.api.network") == 0 && >> > subject.user == "lolo") { >> > return polkit.Result.YES; >> > } >> >}); >> > >> >> Adding this allows you to do anything with any network. This rule does >> omit a condition similar to the above one from the api.domain rule. >> >> >The problem with the previous configuration is that it allows full access >> >to the network, requiring the following configuration: >> > >> >> *to all the networks >> >> >polkit.addRule(function(action, subject) { >> > if ((action.id == "org.libvirt.api.network.stop" || >> > action.id == "org.libvirt.api.network.delete" || >> > action.id == "org.libvirt.api.network.write") && >> > subject.user == "lolo") { >> > return polkit.Result.NO; >> > } >> >}); >> > >> >By default, shouldn't network access behave like domains or pools, which >> >cannot be deleted? >> >> Can you not? The domain undefine API checks domain:delete ACL with the >> domain name and network undefine API checks network:delete ACL with the >> network name. I'll have to test it, but in the meantime could you try >> reproducing that with the same polkit rules (obviously modified to fit >> the domain/network difference)? >> >> >I tested it on Libvirt 9.0.0 and 10.0.0 >> > >> >> I did not find any difference between 9.0.0 and the current master with >> a quick git-fu. >> >> I tested it on current git master and it works fine, the user can >> undefine both the network and the domain, but only the one named as >> specified. >> >> >If you can help me, I would really appreciate it. >> >> Be sure to check that both virtqemud and virtnetworkd use polkit as >> their access driver in their respective configs. >> >> Have a nice day, >> Martin >> >

2 1

How can I control iptables/nftables rules addition on libvirtd host on Debian 12 ?
by oza.4h07＠gmail.com 10 Feb '25

10 Feb '25

Hello, When I install libvirt-daemon on a Debian 12 host, I can see the iptables rules below beeing added. *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :LIBVIRT_FWI - [0:0] :LIBVIRT_FWO - [0:0] :LIBVIRT_FWX - [0:0] :LIBVIRT_INP - [0:0] :LIBVIRT_OUT - [0:0] -A INPUT -j LIBVIRT_INP -A FORWARD -j LIBVIRT_FWX -A FORWARD -j LIBVIRT_FWI -A FORWARD -j LIBVIRT_FWO -A OUTPUT -j LIBVIRT_OUT -A LIBVIRT_FWI -d 192.168.122.0/24 -o virbr0 -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWI -o virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A LIBVIRT_FWO -s 192.168.122.0/24 -i virbr0 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_FWO -i virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A LIBVIRT_FWX -i virbr0 -o virbr0 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_INP -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_OUT -o virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_OUT -o virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_OUT -o virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 68 -j ACCEPT -A LIBVIRT_OUT -o virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 68 -j ACCEPT COMMIT For some reason, I need to add a couple of other rules. How can I do that ? Best regards

5 15

SEV Support Libvirt
by Paraskevas Nik 07 Feb '25

07 Feb '25

*Hello I am trying to enable libvirt to support sev-snp. Currently I am using virsh domcapabilities to check if its enabled but I am getting : <sev supported='no'/>* *Followed the instructions at : * *https://libvirt.org/kbase/launch_security_sev.html* <https://libvirt.org/kbase/launch_security_sev.html> * My AMD CPU supports SEV,SEV-SNP and I have followed all the steps and it is enabled. BIOS settings are configured to support SEV,SNP CPU: AMD EPYC 9254* *# cat /sys/module/kvm_amd/parameters/sev* *Y* *# dmesg | grep -i sev* *[ 0.000000] SEV-SNP: RMP table physical range [0x000000002d500000 - 0x000000004ddfffff]* *[ 0.009021] SEV-SNP: Reserving start/end of RMP table on a 2MB boundary [0x000000002d400000]* *[ 11.184492] ccp 0000:01:00.5: sev enabled* *[ 12.664210] ccp 0000:01:00.5: SEV API:1.55 build:36* *[ 12.664217] ccp 0000:01:00.5: SEV-SNP API:1.55 build:36* *[ 12.671343] kvm_amd: SEV enabled (ASIDs 16 - 1006)* *[ 12.671345] kvm_amd: SEV-ES enabled (ASIDs 1 - 15)* *[ 12.671346] kvm_amd: SEV-SNP enabled (ASIDs 1 - 15)* *Versions:* *Libvirt version: 10.7.0* *qemu-system-x86_64 version : 9.1.0* *Linux kernel version: 6.11.0-rc3* *Distro: Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS* * If you need any other information please let me know.* Thanks!

2 1

Network denied access
by Rodrigo Prieto 06 Feb '25

06 Feb '25

Hello, I am configuring Polkit using an example I found on the web. It correctly displays the assigned domain for a given user, but when I try to start the VM, I get the following error: error: Failed to start domain 'debian12' error: access denied: 'network' denied access Here is my configuration: polkit.addRule(function(action, subject) { if (action.id == "org.libvirt.unix.manage" && subject.user == "lolo") { return polkit.Result.YES; } }); polkit.addRule(function(action, subject) { if (action.id.indexOf("org.libvirt.api.domain.") == 0 && subject.user == "lolo") { if (action.lookup("connect_driver") == 'QEMU' && action.lookup("domain_name") == 'debian12') { return polkit.Result.YES; } else { return polkit.Result.NO; } } }); To grant network access, I have to configure the following: polkit.addRule(function(action, subject) { if (action.id.indexOf("org.libvirt.api.network") == 0 && subject.user == "lolo") { return polkit.Result.YES; } }); The problem with the previous configuration is that it allows full access to the network, requiring the following configuration: polkit.addRule(function(action, subject) { if ((action.id == "org.libvirt.api.network.stop" || action.id == "org.libvirt.api.network.delete" || action.id == "org.libvirt.api.network.write") && subject.user == "lolo") { return polkit.Result.NO; } }); By default, shouldn't network access behave like domains or pools, which cannot be deleted? I tested it on Libvirt 9.0.0 and 10.0.0 If you can help me, I would really appreciate it.

2 1