April 2024 - Users - libvirt List Archives

[libvirt-users] bridge / ubuntu / no arp reply
by François Chenais 15 Oct '26

15 Oct '26

Hello I'm trying to setup a bridged guest on an ubuntu 13.10 but it doesn't work. (Everything is ok with NAT) Network sniffing shows that arp replies don't come back to the guest. Test 1 ------ Guest : ping host_bridge_ip (ok) Test 2 ------ Guest: ping other_lan_host (KO) other_lan_host - receives arp who-is request - sends arp reply - arp -a shows the guest macaddr => Guest doesn't receive reply Test 3 ------ other_lan_host ping the Guest (KO) - arp -a shows "incomplete" addr - Guest receives nothing On Host ------- network tcpdump on bridge or vnet interfaces shows request but no reply ... Thanks in advance for help or ideas François

3 4

trustGuestRxFilters broken after upgrade to Debian 12
by Paul B. Henson 01 Nov '24

01 Nov '24

We've been running Debian 11 for a while, using sr-iov: <network> <name>sr-iov-intel-10G-1</name> <uuid>6bdaa4c8-e720-4ea0-9a50-91cb7f2c83b1</uuid> <forward mode='hostdev' managed='yes'> <pf dev='eth2'/> </forward> </network> and allocating vf's from the pool: <interface type='network' trustGuestRxFilters='yes'> <mac address='52:54:00:08:da:5b'/> <source network='sr-iov-intel-10G-1'/> <vlan> <tag id='50'/> </vlan> <model type='virtio'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/> </interface> After upgrading to Debian 12, when I try to start any vm which uses the trustGuestRxFilters option, it fails to start with the message: error: internal error: unable to execute QEMU command 'query-rx-filter': invalid net client name: hostdev0 If I remove the option, it starts fine (but of course is broken functionality wise as the option wasn't there just for fun :) ). Any thoughts on what's going on here? The Debian 12 versions are: libvirt-daemon/stable,now 9.0.0-4 qemu-system-x86/stable,now 1:7.2+dfsg-7+deb12u3 I see Debian 12 backports has version 8.1.2+ds-1~bpo12+1 of qemu, but no newer versions of libvirt. I haven't tried the backports version to see if that resolves the problem. Thanks much...

5 7

jfKVM - new app using libvirt
by Peter Quiring 06 May '24

06 May '24

jfKVM is a new web-based VM management system based on libvirt. jfkvm.sf.net https://pquiring.github.io/javaforce/projects/jfkvm/docs/help.html Thanks, -- Peter Quiring

1 1

Error Cannot acquire state change lock from remoteDispatchDomainMigratePrepare3Params during live migration of domains
by Christian Rohmann 25 Apr '24

25 Apr '24

Hallo libvirt-users! we observe lock-ups / timeouts with in prometheus-libvirt-exporter (https://github.com/inovex/prometheus-libvirt-exporter) when libvirt is live-migrating domains: > Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock (held by > monitor=remoteDispatchDomainMigratePrepare3Params) All of the source code can be found at: https://github.com/inovex/prometheus-libvirt-exporter/blob/master/pkg/expor…. Basically the error happens when DomainMemoryStats or other operational domain info is queried via the libvirt socket. 1) We are actually using the read-only socket at '/var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock-ro', so there should not be any locking required. Is there any way to not run into lock contention, like running a request with some "nolock" indication? 2) This being reported as timeout waiting for the lock, what is the timeout and would waiting a bit longer help? Or is the lock active during the whole time a domain live migration is running? 3) Is this in any way related to the type of migration? Tunneled vs. native (https://libvirt.org/migration.html)? 4) Is there any indication that we could use to skip those domains (or certain queries)? The same issue was actually previously reported for another implementation of a Prometheus exporter (https://github.com/kumina/libvirt_exporter/issues/33) Currently the exporter locks up or throws the mentioned timeout errors during the the migration of 200 domains, 5 at a time. It would be awesome to find a way to make this work as smooth as possible, even during live migrations! I am thankful for any insights into how the libvirt socket, the various calls, the locking mechanisms or live migration modes work! Regards Christian

5 10

How to configure the default connection for virsh
by Nir Soffer 18 Apr '24

18 Apr '24

We are using minikube vms, which require adding the user to to libvirt group[1]. We use `virsh -c qemu:///system` for debugging these vms or related libvirt networks. Using virsh without specifying the '-c' argument is a common mistake that leads to trouble, for example creating the libvirt default network incorrectly. I wonder if it is possible to configure virsh so it uses -c qemu:///system by default? We know that this is not great, but we don't know a better way to use minikube with the kvm2 driver. The minikube vms are started for creating a development environment and during CI, and they cannot require a password or any complicated setup. [1] https://github.com/kubernetes/minikube/issues/3467 Nir

2 2

Linking virtual sound cards in two virtual machines?
by Lars Kellogg-Stedman 15 Apr '24

15 Apr '24

I would like to create a virtual audio cable between two libvirt guests such that sound output from guest A goes to sound input on guest B, and vice versa. I figure the solution to this is using something like the pulseaudio's "virtual sink", but I'm not entirely sure what the syntax would look like (fwiw, I'm on Fedora 39, which means libvirt 9.7.0, which means this has to be through libvirt's pulseaudio driver rather than the pipewire driver, since the latter isn't available in 9.7.0). I started by creating a virtual sink (and yes, I realize that's only half the process): pactl load-module module-null-sink sink_name=vaudio0 And adding the following snippet to the domain xml for guest "node1.virt": <audio id='1' type='pulseaudio'> <input name='vaudio0' streamName='node1-in' latency='100'/> <output name='vaudio0' streamName='node1-out' latency='100'/> </audio> But trying to start this guest results in: error: Failed to start domain 'node1.virt' error: internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor: audio: Could not init `pa' audio driver There doesn't appear to be any additional information in /var/log/libvirt/qemu/node1.virt.log. I'm wondering if someone has an example of what this might look like? Thanks, -- Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars(a)redhat.com>

1 0

'nconnect' nfs mount option support
by Abhisar Sinha 15 Apr '24

15 Apr '24

Hi, Is there a way to specify the 'nconnect' nfs mount opt value in the XML file used by 'virsh create-pool' command? If not, how hard would it be to implement this functionality? Please advise. Thanks, Abhisar

2 1

TLS Configuration with libvirt and Perfect Forward Secrecy
by Tommy.J.Mairo 09 Apr '24

09 Apr '24

Dear libvirt Users, I'm seeking guidance on configuring TLS with libvirt to achieve perfect forward secrecy (PFS). While I followed the tutorial on setting up TLS with libvirt from the project wiki [1], I encountered an error when bringing up the legacy monolithic libvirt daemon. The error message, "Certificate /etc/pki/libvirt/servercert.pem usage does not permit key encipherment," appeared even though I declared the "encryption_key" field in the certtool template file when generating the server certificate. Moreover, when I inspected the generated certificate with certtool, I discovered that it only had a "Digital signature" entry under X509v3 key usage. The deficiency in "Key Encipherment" usage could result from the key type specifications when generating the private key with the command "certtool --generate-privkey --key-type=ed25519 --curve=Ed25519 --sec-param=ultra > /etc/pki/libvirt/private/serverkey.pem". I prefer using elliptic-curve cryptography, specifically curve25519, over RSA, which the tutorial employs. Although a digital signature-only certificate can still perform Diffie–Hellman exchanges with ECDSA, it cannot encrypt client-generated pre-master secrets. Nonetheless, a TLS session can still be established without pre-master secrets, avoiding session key leakage even if the decryption key is compromised in the future. This fulfills the PFS requirement, and I believe that a certificate without "Key Encipherment" usage contributes to the system's overall security. Based on my understanding, I am seeking any insights or suggestions on whether there is a way to suppress the "certificate usage does not permit key encipherment" error and allow the legacy monolithic libvirt daemon to proceed. Thanks, Tommy.J.Mairo [1] https://wiki.libvirt.org/TLSSetup.html

1 0