August 2015 - Users - libvirt List Archives

[libvirt-users] ceph rbd pool and libvirt manageability (virt-install)
by Jelle de Jong 28 Aug '18

28 Aug '18

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello everybody, I created a rbd pool and activated it, but I can't seem to create volumes in it with virsh or virt-install? # virsh pool-dumpxml myrbdpool <pool type='rbd'> <name>myrbdpool</name> <uuid>2d786f7a-2df3-4d79-ae60-1535bcf1c6b5</uuid> <capacity unit='bytes'>6997998301184</capacity> <allocation unit='bytes'>10309227031</allocation> <available unit='bytes'>6977204658176</available> <source> <host name='ceph01.powercraft.nl' port='6789'/> <host name='ceph02.powercraft.nl' port='6789'/> <host name='ceph03.powercraft.nl' port='6789'/> <name>libvirt-pool</name> <auth type='ceph' username='libvirt'> <secret uuid='029a334e-ed57-4293-bb99-ffafa8867122'/> </auth> </source> </pool> # virt-install --version 1.0.1 # virsh --version 1.2.9 I ended using virsh edit ceph-test.powercraft.nl and making creating the disk manually. <disk type='network' device='disk'> <auth username='libvirt'> <secret type='ceph' uuid='029a334e-ed57-4293-bb99-ffafa8867122'/> </auth> <source protocol='rbd' name='libvirt-pool/kvm01-storage'> <host name='ceph01.powercraft.nl' port='6789'/> <host name='ceph02.powercraft.nl' port='6789'/> <host name='ceph03.powercraft.nl' port='6789'/> </source> <target dev='vdc' bus='virtio'/> </disk> I use virt-install a lot to define, import and undefine domains, how can I use virt-install to manage my rdb disks? Kind regards, Jelle de Jong -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iJwEAQECAAYFAlV1xlQACgkQ1WclBW9j5HkbPQP+PjNrzvlqysslOp2Yk7wH4Mxy 2sh2dn96G0KOAHEeEn3BN6IWlnD1TADZbHdpTtMwkdv48Xwn0sP1s+3QDM4pb3gP n+z+dVxS8FouDIy/eiso3IBCj3g4TWbEX8ZHqs3jKqe0lZgAXBzB9xYSUowcEBrZ ddkPbr8p8ozWyOG+9V8= =lkK7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 3

[libvirt-users] virRandomBits - not very random
by Brian Rak 01 Jun '18

01 Jun '18

I just ran into an issue where I had about 30 guests get duplicate mac addresses assigned. These were scattered across 30 different machines. Some debugging revealed that: 1) All the host machines were restarted within a couple seconds of each other 2) All the host machines had fairly similar libvirtd pids (within ~100 PIDs of each other) 3) Libvirt seeds the RNG using 'time(NULL) ^ getpid()' This perfectly explains why I saw so many duplicate mac addresses. Why is the RNG seed such a predictable value? Surely there has to be a better source of a random seed then the timestamp and the pid? The PID seems to me to be a very bad source of any randomness. I just ran a test across 60 of our hosts. 43 of them shared their PID with at least one other machine.

7 13

[libvirt-users] Libvirt bite sized tasks
by Michal Privoznik 20 Mar '16

20 Mar '16

Dear lists, I've just started new wiki page which aim is to summarize small and trivial tasks, that starting contributors can take, investigate and implement. The aim is to give them something easy to start with while not scaring them out about complexity of our code. The page can be found here: http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/BiteSizedTasks The name is copied from qemu wiki: http://wiki.qemu.org/BiteSizedTasks Please, feel free to extend the list. I plan to use it in the future when interviewing GSoC candidates. Michal

2 1

[libvirt-users] virDomainCoreDumpWithFormat files created as root
by NoxDaFox 18 Nov '15

18 Nov '15

Greetings, I am dumping a guest VM memory for inspection using the command "virDomainCoreDumpWithFormat" and the created files appear to belong to root (both user and group). I have searched around but didn't find any answer. Is there a way to instruct QEMU to create those files under a different user? Thank you.

5 7

[libvirt-users] PCI passthrough fails in virsh: iommu group is not viable
by Alex Holst 25 Sep '15

25 Sep '15

I would really appreciate some pointers on what I am doing wrong here. I have a need to run multiple virtual guests which have each their own GPU and some USB controllers passed-through. I am able to run one of the guests like this (assuming vfio stuff has happened elsewhere), but I would prefer to use virsh: kvm -M q35 -m 8192 -cpu host,kvm=off \ -smp 4,sockets=1,cores=4,threads=1 \ -bios /usr/share/seabios/bios.bin -vga none \ -device ioh3420,bus=pcie.0,addr=1c.0,multifunction=on,port=1,chassis=1,id=root.1 \ -device vfio-pci,host=02:00.0,bus=root.1,addr=00.0,multifunction=on,x-vga=on \ -device vfio-pci,host=02:00.1,bus=root.1,addr=00.1 \ -device vfio-pci,host=00:1d.0,bus=pcie.0 \ -device vfio-pci,host=00:1a.0,bus=pcie.0 \ -nographic -boot menu=on /vm2/foo.img I found the hardware addresses using lspci. When I invoke the same machine with virsh with what I believe are the same addresses, I get: virsh # start foo error: Failed to start domain foo error: internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor: 2015-08-12T18:24:10.651720Z qemu-system-x86_64: -device vfio-pci,host=02:00.0,id=hostdev0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4: vfio: error, group 18 is not viable, please ensure all devices within the iommu_group are bound to their vfio bus driver. 2015-08-12T18:24:10.651752Z qemu-system-x86_64: -device vfio-pci,host=02:00.0,id=hostdev0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4: vfio: failed to get group 18 2015-08-12T18:24:10.651766Z qemu-system-x86_64: -device vfio-pci,host=02:00.0,id=hostdev0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4: Device initialization failed. 2015-08-12T18:24:10.651781Z qemu-system-x86_64: -device vfio-pci,host=02:00.0,id=hostdev0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4: Device 'vfio-pci' could not be initialized I have included dumpxml output below -- is the hostdev section wrong? <domain type='kvm'> <name>foo</name> <uuid>51f57655-11be-41bf-b925-2e6aef01f9c4</uuid> <memory unit='KiB'>8388608</memory> <currentMemory unit='KiB'>8388608</currentMemory> <vcpu placement='static' current='1'>4</vcpu> <os> <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-i440fx-utopic'>hvm</type> <bootmenu enable='yes'/> </os> <features> <acpi/> <apic/> <pae/> <hyperv> <relaxed state='on'/> <vapic state='on'/> <spinlocks state='on' retries='8191'/> </hyperv> </features> <cpu mode='custom' match='exact'> <model fallback='allow'>SandyBridge</model> <topology sockets='1' cores='4' threads='1'/> </cpu> <clock offset='localtime'> <timer name='rtc' tickpolicy='catchup'/> <timer name='pit' tickpolicy='delay'/> <timer name='hpet' present='no'/> <timer name='hypervclock' present='yes'/> </clock> <on_poweroff>destroy</on_poweroff> <on_reboot>restart</on_reboot> <on_crash>restart</on_crash> <pm> <suspend-to-mem enabled='no'/> <suspend-to-disk enabled='no'/> </pm> <devices> <emulator>/usr/bin/kvm-spice</emulator> <disk type='file' device='disk'> <driver name='qemu' type='raw'/> <source file='/vm2/foo.img'/> <target dev='sda' bus='sata'/> <boot order='1'/> <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0' target='0' unit='0'/> </disk> <disk type='block' device='cdrom'> <driver name='qemu' type='raw'/> <target dev='hdb' bus='ide'/> <readonly/> <boot order='2'/> <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0' target='0' unit='1'/> </disk> <controller type='usb' index='0' model='ich9-ehci1'> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x06' function='0x7'/> </controller> <controller type='usb' index='0' model='ich9-uhci1'> <master startport='0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x06' function='0x0' multifunction='on'/> </controller> <controller type='usb' index='0' model='ich9-uhci2'> <master startport='2'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x06' function='0x1'/> </controller> <controller type='usb' index='0' model='ich9-uhci3'> <master startport='4'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x06' function='0x2'/> </controller> <controller type='pci' index='0' model='pci-root'/> <controller type='ide' index='0'> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x01' function='0x1'/> </controller> <controller type='virtio-serial' index='0'> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x05' function='0x0'/> </controller> <controller type='sata' index='0'> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x08' function='0x0'/> </controller> <interface type='direct'> <mac address='52:54:00:f0:47:f5'/> <source dev='p5p1' mode='bridge'/> <model type='e1000'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/> </interface> <serial type='pty'> <target port='0'/> </serial> <console type='pty'> <target type='serial' port='0'/> </console> <channel type='spicevmc'> <target type='virtio' name='com.redhat.spice.0'/> <address type='virtio-serial' controller='0' bus='0' port='1'/> </channel> <input type='tablet' bus='usb'/> <input type='mouse' bus='ps2'/> <input type='keyboard' bus='ps2'/> <graphics type='spice' autoport='yes'/> <video> <model type='cirrus' vram='16384' heads='1'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x02' function='0x0'/> </video> <hostdev mode='subsystem' type='pci' managed='yes'> <source> <address domain='0x0000' bus='0x02' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/> </source> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x04' function='0x0'/> </hostdev> <memballoon model='virtio'> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x07' function='0x0'/> </memballoon> </devices> </domain> -- Alex Holst

2 3

[libvirt-users] When adding a channel device, we need a shutdown
by Jean-Pierre Ribeauville 07 Sep '15

07 Sep '15

Hi, It looks like , when adding a channel device, that the Guest must be powered off / on to be able to detect the new device . ( simple reboot isn't not enough) Is there any way to avoid this power_cycle ? Thx. J.P. Ribeauville P: +33.(0).1.47.17.27.87 Puteaux 3 Etage 5 Bureau 4 jpribeauville(a)axway.com<mailto:jpribeauville@axway.com> http://www.axway.com<http://www.axway.com/> P Pensez à l'environnement avant d'imprimer.

2 3

[libvirt-users] about guest live migration configuration changes persistence ..
by Jean-Pierre Ribeauville 03 Sep '15

03 Sep '15

Hi, Is a change , by edit it via virsh edit , in the "local" .xml configuration file (i.e. adding a channel device) persistent when live migrating the guest on another host ? Thx. J.P. Ribeauville P: +33.(0).1.47.17.27.87 Puteaux 3 Etage 5 Bureau 4 jpribeauville(a)axway.com<mailto:jpribeauville@axway.com> http://www.axway.com<http://www.axway.com/> P Pensez à l'environnement avant d'imprimer.

3 5

[libvirt-users] VM locking
by Prof. Dr. Michael Schefczyk 01 Sep '15

01 Sep '15

Dear All, I am trying to use VM (disk) locking on a two node Centos 7 KVM cluster. Unfortunately, I am not successful. Using virtlockd (https://libvirt.org/locking-lockd.html) I get each host to write the zero length file with a hashed filename to the shared folder specified. Regardless of which host I start a VM (domain) on, they do produce the identical filename per VM. What does not work, however, is to prevent the second host to start the VM already running on the first VM. Using sanlock (https://libvirt.org/locking-sanlock.html) no domains do start at all. However, the file "__LIBVIRT__DISKS__" is also not written to the shared folder. Hence, nothing works. Can someone please point me to the right direction? My system is current Centos 7 using a gluster storage setup like suggested for oVirt (https://community.redhat.com/blog/2014/10/up-and-running-with-ovirt-3-5/) based on the oVirt 3.5 repo but without an engine. I do this, because I want to retain VM files in qcow2 format for live backups and with human readable names. What does work then is, e.g., live migration. A locking mechanism to prevent starting a VM twice would be good. Please note that this configuration - both according to redhat and to my own trial and error - requires Lock=False in /etc/nfsmount.conf. Is there a connection with my findings? My issues occur regardless of the files being in NFS or Gluster folders. KVM must load the Gluster storage indirectly via NFS rather than straight via Gluster, as Gluster storage does not seem to fully work, at least in virt-manager. My software versions are: libvirt 1.2.8-16.el7_1.3.x86_64 qemu-kvm ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.3.1.x86_64 Regards, Michael

2 2

[libvirt-users] Live migration & storage copy broken since 1.2.17
by Antoine Millet 31 Aug '15

31 Aug '15

Hi, It seems that live migration using storage copy is broken since libvirt 1.2.17. Here is the command line used to do the migration using virsh: virsh migrate --live --p2p --persistent --undefinesource --copy -storage-all d2b545d3-db32-48d3-b7fa-f62ff3a7fa18 qemu+tcp://dest/system XML dump of my storage: <pool type='logical'> <name>local</name> <uuid>276bda97-d6c2-4681-bc3f-0c8c221bd1b1</uuid> <capacity unit='bytes'>1024207093760</capacity> <allocation unit='bytes'>4294967296</allocation> <available unit='bytes'>1019912126464</available> <source> <name>hkvm</name> <format type='lvm2'/> </source> <target> <path>/dev/hkvm</path> </target> </pool> When it fails, I get the following error: error: Storage volume not found: no storage vol with matching name '402aea08-26aa-45b6-a46e-a3b02137ff26' Where 402aea08-26aa-45b6-a46e-a3b02137ff26 is the volume bound to my VM: <disk type='volume' device='disk'> <driver name='qemu' type='raw' cache='none'/> <source pool='local' volume='402aea08-26aa-45b6-a46e -a3b02137ff26'/> <backingStore/> <target dev='vda' bus='virtio'/> <alias name='virtio-disk0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x04' function='0x0'/> </disk> Here is the test result (version is for both source and destination): - 1.2.15 -> ok - 1.2.16 -> ok - 1.2.17 -> fails - 1.2.18 -> fails Is it a bug? Do I miss something? Thanks, Antoine

1 1

[libvirt-users] CPU feature 'svm' not reported inside guest without 'host-passthrough'
by Sladjan Ristic 30 Aug '15

30 Aug '15

Hi, I am confused by the behaviour of the CPU description in my VM. I have a host with an AMD CPU with SVM feature and I want to try nested virtualization on a Fedora22 guest. The host is Fedora22 as well. libvirtd (libvirt) 1.2.13.1 kernel 4.1.6-200.fc22.x86_64 1. I tried 'custom' mode with model qemu64 with required feature 'SVM' but '/proc/cpuinfo' in the guest doesn't show SVM. 2. However, if I forbid the SVM feature, the guest can't be created and libvirt complains that the host CPU has SVM. 3. The only way to have SVM reported in '/proc/cpuinfo' inside the guest VM is using 'host-passthrough' mode, but I want to avoid it to allow migration of the VM. Is this an issue with AMD This is part of the description of the guest: <domain type='kvm'> <name>vagrant-fedora-libvirt-nested_default</name> <uuid>4a379890-b891-4971-aad6-12fad45eaebc</uuid> <memory unit='KiB'>8388608</memory> <currentMemory unit='KiB'>8388608</currentMemory> <vcpu placement='static'>4</vcpu> <os> <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-i440fx-2.3'>hvm</type> <boot dev='hd'/> </os> <features> <acpi/> <apic/> <pae/> </features> <cpu mode='custom' match='exact'> <model fallback='allow'>qemu64</model> <feature policy='require' name='svm'/> </cpu> Regards, Sladjan

1 0

[libvirt-users] vms not persistent after upgrading to f22?
by Rich Megginson 28 Aug '15

28 Aug '15

With f21 and earlier, I could just call virt-install to create VMs, and they would persist after reboot. After upgrading to f22, when I shut off a VM, it is removed, and has to be recreated. How can I get VMs to persist? Is there a virsh create or virt-install switch to do this?

3 3

[libvirt-users] Isolated networks && test lab
by Spanky Horawitz 28 Aug '15

28 Aug '15

I'm trying to migrate my VirtualBox test lab to KVM. In my VB configuration, I have several VM routers with 4 interfaces each. Each router has a bridged interface which connects them all together and to the outside world. I have servers/clients dispersed on each of the other private (Isolated) segments that use the routers as default gateways. In trying to make this work, I used Virtual Machine Manager to define 3x Virtual Networks (Isolated networks) and created a VM router which has 3 interfaces (192.168.x.1) on each Isolated network and a 4th interface using the br0 interface to get to the outside world. The router is able to connect to the outside world. Using Virtual Machine Manager, I also created "client" VM and connected it's single interface to one of the Isolated networks. While testing connectivity of the "client" VM to the router, it seems to go straight to the Host (tested using 'ssh 192.168.x.1'.) I'm trying to isolate the networks from the Host and have the router receive packets for the 192.168.x.1 address on the individual Isolated network segments. Host: br0 (em1): 192.168.1.16 vibr0 (default): 192.168.122.1 virbr1: 192.168.2.1 virbr2: 192.168.3.1 virbr3: 192.168.4.1 VM router: eth0: 192.168.1.10 eth1: 192.168.2.1 eth2: 192.168.3.1 eth3: 192.168.4.1 VM client: eth0: 192.168.3.101 Is there some trick to isolate the Host from the VM's? Is there a comprehensive guide that explains how the networks should be setup (with/without Virtual Machine Manager)? I'm not afraid to get my hands dirty on the console if needed, but GUI's are easier to navigate when you're learning a new technology. I switched to using RemoteBox for managing my VB vm's as it made things a lot easier to deal with than VBoxManage. Thanks for your help!

2 10

Re: [libvirt-users] Using unix-type channel ....
by Michal Privoznik 27 Aug '15

27 Aug '15

On 28.08.2015 08:34, Jean-Pierre Ribeauville wrote: > HI, > > > > Thx for your hint. > > > > I've tried this instead : > > > > <channel type='unix'> > > <source mode='bind' path='/opt/omnivision_1.agent'/> > > <target type='virtio' name='omnivision_1.agent'/> > > <address type='virtio-serial' controller='0' bus='0' port='2'/> > > </channel> > > > > Then, when starting the Guest I get this error message : [It's better to send just text via e-mail] So, the error message is telling you, that qemu process does not have enough permissions to bind to the unix socket under the given path. Either you should level up qemu permissions (e.g. run it as root), or use path that qemu will have access to. Or set correct permissions on the socket target. Michal

2 1

[libvirt-users] Using unix-type channel ....
by Jean-Pierre Ribeauville 27 Aug '15

27 Aug '15

Hi, I'm trying to use unix-type channel to send/receive datas between host and guest . Here are the steps I follow : 1) Adding these lines to expose a channel unix type to my guest <channel type='unix'> <source mode='bind' path='/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/omnivision_1.agent'/> <target type='virtio' name='org.qemu.guest_agent.0'/> <alias name='channel0'/> <address type='virtio-serial' controller='0' bus='0' port='2'/> </channel> 2) the VM_Orion-1 Guest, exposing a channel "unix" omnivision_1.agent is started, then netstat shows these new things : netstat -apn | grep qemu unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 37214 19124/qemu-kvm /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/VM_Orion-1.monitor unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 37219 19124/qemu-kvm /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/omnivision_1.agent unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 37242 19124/qemu-kvm /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/omnivision_1.agent unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 37240 19124/qemu-kvm /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/VM_Orion-1.monitor 3) I start , on the host , a simple test in order to send datas to the guest: ..... sock = socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0); if (sock < 0) { perror("opening stream socket"); return(1); } server.sun_family = AF_UNIX; strcpy(server.sun_path, argv[1]); printf("connecting to socket number : %d \n",sock); fflush(stdout); if (connect(sock, (struct sockaddr *) &server, sizeof(struct sockaddr_un)) < 0) { close(sock); perror("connecting stream socket"); return(1); } printf("writing data on stream socket"); if (write(sock, DATA, sizeof(DATA)) < 0) perror("writing on stream socket"); close(sock); ..... 4) invoking > test "/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/omnivision_1.agent" then I got : connecting to socket number : 3 writing data on stream socket and following netstat result : netstat -apn | grep qemu unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 39348 20587/qemu-kvm /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/VM_Orion-1.monitor unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 39353 20587/qemu-kvm /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/omnivision_1.agent unix 2 [ ] STREAM CONNECTING 0 - /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/omnivision_1.agent unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 39375 20587/qemu-kvm /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/omnivision_1.agent unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 39373 20587/qemu-kvm /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/VM_Orion-1.monitor 5) if I try to re-invoke test "/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/omnivision_1.agent" then : netstat -apn | grep qemu tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5902 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 20587/qemu-kvm tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5902 127.0.0.1:57772 ESTABLISHED 20587/qemu-kvm unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 39348 20587/qemu-kvm /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/VM_Orion-1.monitor unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 39353 20587/qemu-kvm /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/omnivision_1.agent unix 2 [ ] STREAM CONNECTING 0 - /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/omnivision_1.agent unix 2 [ ] STREAM CONNECTING 0 - /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/omnivision_1.agent unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 39375 20587/qemu-kvm /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/omnivision_1.agent unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 39373 20587/qemu-kvm /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/VM_Orion-1.monitor on the guest side , I try to retrieve datas sent by host , by using this kind of thing : ... int fd = open("/dev/virtio-ports/org.qemu.guest_agent.0", O_RDWR | O_NONBLOCK); ssize_t size = read(fd, &buffer, 100); ... As you can imagine , I never receive any data from the host . Is it the right way to use this "unix-type" channel ? Thx for your patience. Regards, J.P. Ribeauville P: +33.(0).1.47.17.27.87 Puteaux 3 Etage 5 Bureau 4 jpribeauville(a)axway.com<mailto:jpribeauville@axway.com> http://www.axway.com<http://www.axway.com/> P Pensez à l'environnement avant d'imprimer.

2 2

[libvirt-users] Virtio serial exposition
by Jean-Pierre Ribeauville 27 Aug '15

27 Aug '15

Hi, I try to exchange datas between host and Guest by adding these lines in a guest .xml conf file : <channel type='pty'> <target type='virtio' name='arbitrary.virtio.serial.port.name'/> <address type='virtio-serial' controller='0' bus='0' port='1'/> </channel> Then /dev/virtio-ports/arbitrary.virtio.serial.port.name is exposed in the guest and a /dev/pts/x is seen as source path on the host. I checked that on two Linux hosts : 1) libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu-1.2.8-16.el7_1.3.x86_64 qemu-kvm-1.5.3-86.el7_1.5.x86_64 qemu-kvm-common-1.5.3-86.el7_1.5.x86_64 qemu-guest-agent-2.1.0-4.el7.x86_64 ipxe-roms-qemu-20130517-6.gitc4bce43.el7.noarch qemu-img-1.5.3-86.el7_1.5.x86_64 Linux sparring 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jan 29 18:37:38 EST 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 2) qemu-img-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.x86_64 qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.x86_64 gpxe-roms-qemu-0.9.7-6.10.el6.noarch Linux orion 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Nov 10 22:19:54 EST 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux The device is only exposed on the guest of the first host . Is it due to a too old version of qemu and/or Linux on the second host or some packages missing on this second host ? Thx. Regards, J.P. Ribeauville P: +33.(0).1.47.17.27.87 Puteaux 3 Etage 5 Bureau 4 jpribeauville(a)axway.com<mailto:jpribeauville@axway.com> http://www.axway.com<http://www.axway.com/> P Pensez à l'environnement avant d'imprimer.

2 2

Re: [libvirt-users] On which /dev/pts/x is channel source
by Jean-Pierre Ribeauville 26 Aug '15

26 Aug '15

Hi, I just tested by using "unix virtio" channel instead of pty. It looks easier to handle. Thx for help. Regards, J.P. -----Message d'origine----- De : libvirt-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:libvirt-users-bounces@redhat.com] De la part de libvirt-users-request(a)redhat.com Envoyé : mercredi 26 août 2015 15:38 À : libvirt-users(a)redhat.com Objet : libvirt-users Digest, Vol 68, Issue 26 Send libvirt-users mailing list submissions to libvirt-users(a)redhat.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to libvirt-users-request(a)redhat.com You can reach the person managing the list at libvirt-users-owner(a)redhat.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of libvirt-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Isolated networks && test lab (Spanky Horawitz) 2. Re: On which /dev/pts/x is channel source mapped ? (Pierre Schweitzer) 3. Virtio serial exposition (Jean-Pierre Ribeauville) 4. Re: On which /dev/pts/x is channel source mapped ? (Daniel P. Berrange) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:17:56 -0700 From: Spanky Horawitz <shorawitz(a)gmail.com> To: libvirt-users(a)redhat.com Subject: [libvirt-users] Isolated networks && test lab Message-ID: <1440548276.17239.68.camel@psdchristensen> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I'm trying to migrate my VirtualBox test lab to KVM. In my VB configuration, I have several VM routers with 4 interfaces each. Each router has a bridged interface which connects them all together and to the outside world. I have servers/clients dispersed on each of the other private (Isolated) segments that use the routers as default gateways. In trying to make this work, I used Virtual Machine Manager to define 3x Virtual Networks (Isolated networks) and created a VM router which has 3 interfaces (192.168.x.1) on each Isolated network and a 4th interface using the br0 interface to get to the outside world. The router is able to connect to the outside world. Using Virtual Machine Manager, I also created "client" VM and connected it's single interface to one of the Isolated networks. While testing connectivity of the "client" VM to the router, it seems to go straight to the Host (tested using 'ssh 192.168.x.1'.) I'm trying to isolate the networks from the Host and have the router receive packets for the 192.168.x.1 address on the individual Isolated network segments. Host: br0 (em1): 192.168.1.16 vibr0 (default): 192.168.122.1 virbr1: 192.168.2.1 virbr2: 192.168.3.1 virbr3: 192.168.4.1 VM router: eth0: 192.168.1.10 eth1: 192.168.2.1 eth2: 192.168.3.1 eth3: 192.168.4.1 VM client: eth0: 192.168.3.101 Is there some trick to isolate the Host from the VM's? Is there a comprehensive guide that explains how the networks should be setup (with/without Virtual Machine Manager)? I'm not afraid to get my hands dirty on the console if needed, but GUI's are easier to navigate when you're learning a new technology. I switched to using RemoteBox for managing my VB vm's as it made things a lot easier to deal with than VBoxManage. Thanks for your help!

1 0

[libvirt-users] On which /dev/pts/x is channel source mapped ?
by Jean-Pierre Ribeauville 26 Aug '15

26 Aug '15

Hi, By adding following lines in a Guest .xml conf file , I'm able to send / receive datas between host and this guest. <channel type='pty'> <target type='virtio' name='arbitrary.virtio.serial.port.name'/> <address type='virtio-serial' controller='0' bus='0' port='1'/> </channel> My question is the following : How may I find to which /dev/pts/x is mapped the source path ( from the host point of view) ? I was able to find it by having a look in the virt manager GUI , but I want to do it programmatically. I've tried to force it by specifying a source path in the .xml file .... No way Thx for help. Regards, J.P. Ribeauville P: +33.(0).1.47.17.27.87 Puteaux 3 Etage 5 Bureau 4 jpribeauville(a)axway.com<mailto:jpribeauville@axway.com> http://www.axway.com<http://www.axway.com/> P Pensez à l'environnement avant d'imprimer.

3 2

[libvirt-users] Check whether we are runnig on a KVM guest
by Jean-Pierre Ribeauville 25 Aug '15

25 Aug '15

Hi, How may I , via a C program , check whether I'm running on a KVM guest ? May I use the same API on Windows and Linux Guest ? Regards, J.P. Ribeauville P: +33.(0).1.47.17.27.87 Puteaux 3 Etage 5 Bureau 4 jpribeauville(a)axway.com<mailto:jpribeauville@axway.com> http://www.axway.com<http://www.axway.com/> P Pensez à l'environnement avant d'imprimer.

2 1

[libvirt-users] from command line to xml file
by Jean-Pierre Ribeauville 25 Aug '15

25 Aug '15

Hi, In order to use a virtio-serial to exchange data between host and its guests, I'd like to modify the .xml Guest conf file by adding these parameters ( as found in the command line) : -device virtio-serial \ -chardev socket,path=/tmp/foo,server,nowait,id=foo \ -device virtserialport,chardev=foo,name=org.fedoraproject.port.0 How should I build the XML tags ? Thx for help. J.P. Ribeauville P: +33.(0).1.47.17.27.87 Puteaux 3 Etage 5 Bureau 4 jpribeauville(a)axway.com<mailto:jpribeauville@axway.com> http://www.axway.com<http://www.axway.com/> P Pensez à l'environnement avant d'imprimer.

2 1

[libvirt-users] "error: error creating bridge interface virbr0: Operation not supported" occurred what net-start default
by chenhongzhen＠zhicloud.com 24 Aug '15

24 Aug '15

Hi, All! I found a bug! When I start the default network, I got a error shown as below: [root@localhost ~]# virsh net-start default error: Failed to start network default error: error creating bridge interface virbr0: Operation not supported snapshot: 陈鸿圳/chenhongzhen(a)zhicloud.com 13662457180 020-38260999 020-38260988 www.zhicloud.com 广州市天河区黄埔大道西100号富力盈泰广场A座1011

4 3

[libvirt-users] Detaching device behaviour
by Amit Aviram 24 Aug '15

24 Aug '15

Hi all. In libvirt documentation it is written that virDomainDetachDeviceFlags is an asynchronous call: http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainDetachDeviceFl… Does that mean that also virDomainDetachDevice is asynchronous? the reasons mentioned in the above seems relevant for this one as well. Thanks!

2 1

[libvirt-users] Configuration for NATing VMs in a host
by Nacho Otal 24 Aug '15

24 Aug '15

Hi all!, I have a setup in which I want to NAT several Virtual Machines from the host based on ports all of them running CentOS 7.1. The idea is I have several different services running in different VMs and all of them are accessible from the host using different ports that are forwarded to the correct ones in the VMs. I’ve been able to set this up and running configuring the VMs with a virtio network interface and command line redirection on the XML configuration file. However, it is proving to be non stable. Even though VMs are running ok, connection is not possible at some stage until the VM is rebooted and it looks like the port forwarding is not working anymore. I wrote a small script that adds and deletes rules for port forwarding triggered by the qemu hooks and that has brought the needed stability but I’d like to go to a cleaner solution based on firewall-cmd or get rid of it in case it’s possible. On the first draft that I’m using firewall-cmd instead of the iptables rules, it proves to be as unstable as without the qemu hook script. My fear is I’m not configuring libvirt properly. Has anyone experienced such this behaviour and can point me to a better solution?. Thanks for your time, Nacho

1 0

[libvirt-users] Static USB port passthrough is not possible
by Alexander 21 Aug '15

21 Aug '15

Hello, I am currently trying to configure of forwarding devices from specific USB ports which is supported by QEMU. But I don't see any support from libvirt side. Due to libvirt security it occurs to be impossible to passthrough devices from specific bus+port combination. As workaround I may suggest only writing udev rules which use specific script which adds devices to running domains. Unfortunately situation becomes more complicated when I do need to passthrough these devices during system boot -- the special service is required which will handle all these devices after libvirt-guests are up. Does anybody knows how I can do this passthrough without udev workarounds? Thanks. -- Best regards, Alexander Betaev

1 0

[libvirt-users] Windows 10 guest
by Bill Kenworthy 19 Aug '15

19 Aug '15

I am trying to install windows 10 (dreamspark education ISO) into qemu-kvm on Gentoo linux. I got past the cpu problems but am stuck on the image file drivers. The relevant xml is below. It asks for the driver disk which I have, but if I select a driver (either vioscsi or viostor which show as valid it churns away for a few seconds and brings up the cant find driver dialog and cant progress. I've tried both the 102 and 109 RH driver versions (Ive tried most drivers from the ISO's that shows as compatible, usually win8 or 8.1.) Both cdrom xml definitions work fine, but the disk one doesn't and I cant find the magic incantation. <os> <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-q35-2.4'>hvm</type> </os> <features> <acpi/> <apic/> <hyperv> <relaxed state='on'/> <vapic state='on'/> <spinlocks state='on' retries='8191'/> </hyperv> <kvm> <hidden state='on'/> </kvm> </features> <cpu mode='custom' match='exact'> <model fallback='allow'>core2duo</model> <vendor>Intel</vendor> <topology sockets='1' cores='2' threads='2'/> and <devices> <emulator>/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64</emulator> <disk type='file' device='disk'> <driver name='qemu' type='qcow2' cache='none'/> <source file='/mnt/vm/Win10/Win10_disk1.qcow2'/> <target dev='vda' bus='virtio'/> <boot order='2'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x02' slot='0x06' function='0x0'/> </disk> <disk type='file' device='cdrom'> <driver name='qemu' type='raw'/> <source file='/mnt/vm/Win10/en_windows_10_education_x64_dvd_6848120.iso'/> <target dev='hda' bus='ide'/> <readonly/> <boot order='1'/> <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0' target='0' unit='0'/> </disk> <disk type='file' device='cdrom'> <driver name='qemu' type='raw'/> <source file='/mnt/vm/Win10/virtio-win-0.1.102.iso'/> <target dev='hdb' bus='ide'/> <readonly/> <boot order='3'/> <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='1' target='0' unit='0'/> </disk>

1 1

[libvirt-users] Problem after upgrading libvirt to 1.2.9 version on Debian Wheezy
by Fiorenza Meini 19 Aug '15

19 Aug '15

Hi there, I upgraded the package and now I receive this error while trying to start libvirtd. Is there a solution ? BUG: /build/buildd-libnl3_3.2.7-4-amd64-WWfXnH/libnl3-3.2.7/./lib/route/tc.c:970 Regards Fiorenza Meini -- Spazio Web S.r.l. V. Dante, 10 13900 Biella Tel.: +39 015 2431982 Fax.: +39 015 2522600 Numero d'Iscrizione al Registro Imprese presso CCIAA Biella, Cod.Fisc.e P.Iva: 02414430021 Iscriz. REA: BI - 188936 Cap. Soc.: €. 30.000 i.v.

2 1