Re: [libvirt-users] Network without forward mode
❦ 25 juillet 2016 08:44 CEST, Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com> :
>> "Just a vnet interface, no bridge" means you want
no network. Where
>> should the vnet be connected?
>
>The host is able to handle the routing. It seems I could just declare an
>interface of type "ethernet" instead of "network" to get the
effect I
>want.
I'm sorry, but I have no idea what is the end result you are trying to
achieve. Could you describe what are your trying to set up without
libvirt technicalities?
I have a process watching libvirt event to add a route like "ip route
add 192.0.2.147/32 dev vnet18" once the VM is spawned. The host is then
responsible for any routing to/from the VM. I don't want the VM to be
part of a bridge.
--
Indent to show the logical structure of a program.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)