On 28.01.2014 12:46, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:32:41PM +0100, Jan Olszak wrote:
>>Hi there!
>>
>>I am trying to turn on user namespace by adding following lines to the
>>config:
>>
>>
>> <idmap>
>>
>> <uid start='0' target='0' count='100000'/>
>>
>> <gid start='0' target='0' count='100000'/>
>>
>> </idmap>
>>
>>
>>As you can see the root in container is mapped to the root outside. I was
>>expected to see no difference after adding this lines, but unfortunately
>>there are some (see details below).
>>
>>Am I missing something or is there a problem with system, libvirt or kernel?
>I've not had any chance to try LXC + user namespaces + systemd yet, but
>based on the list of things which fail, it seems like it might not be
>detecting that it is inside a container. Seems almost like it has still
>got the CAP_MKNOD permission and so is strying to start things it should
>not have like udev, and various filesystems.
>
>Daniel
I was able to reduce the problem by not using libvirt nor systemd.
I've created a bash process inside user namespace with mapping
root_inside<->root_outside.
I've used a program from
https://lwn.net/Articles/532593/ :
./userns_child_exec -U -M '0 0 1' -G '0 0 1' bash
This program simply calls clone with CLONE_NEWUSER flag and set
proper uid_map and gid_map.
The test commands are as follows:
mkdir /test
mount debugfs /test -t debugfs
and strace shows:
mount("debugfs", "/test", "debugfs", MS_MGC_VAL, NULL) = -1
EPERM
(Operation not permitted)
Now the question is:
Is it a kernel bug or expected behavior ie. inside user namespace we
have always limited permissions even if uid=0 inside container is
mapped to uid=0 outside?
uid==0 inside the container will not have exactly the same
permissions as uid==0 in the host. The reason is due to the
way the kernel is checking capabilities. When a syscall
requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN, for example, the kernel will either
use capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) which only succeeds in the host,
or ns_capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) which is allowed to suceed in
the container.
Different filesystems have differing restrictions, but at
this time the vast majority of filesystems require that
capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) succeeed and thus you can only
mount them in the host.
Daniel
--
|: