On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 06:58:53AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 25 juillet 2016 06:06 CEST, Martin Kletzander
<mkletzan(a)redhat.com> :
>>╭─────┤
http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html#elementsConnect ├─────
>>│Inclusion of the forward element indicates that the virtual network is
>>│to be connected to the physical LAN.Since 0.3.0. The mode attribute
>>│determines the method of forwarding. If there is no forward element, the
>>│network will be isolated from any other network (unless a guest
>>│connected to that network is acting as a router, of course).
>>╰─────
>>
>>That's exactly what I want: just a vnet interface, no bridge, no
>>routing, no forwarding. However, if I create a network with just that:
>>
>
> "Just a vnet interface, no bridge" means you want no network. Where
> should the vnet be connected?
The host is able to handle the routing. It seems I could just declare an
interface of type "ethernet" instead of "network" to get the effect I
want.
I'm sorry, but I have no idea what is the end result you are trying to
achieve. Could you describe what are your trying to set up without
libvirt technicalities?