Re: [libvirt-users] Convincing libvirt to create a bridge device?

I was hoping that I could delegate creation of bridge devices to libvirt for address-less bridges, in order to not have to deal with the various ways distributions handle persistent network configuration, but while this creates a libvirt network... <network> <name>provision</name> <forward mode='bridge'/> <bridge name='brprov'/> </network> ...it doesn't actually create the bridge. Configuring the bridge using either <forward mode="route"/> or <forward mode="nat"/> *will* create the bridge device, but both of these require assigning an address to the bridge which means I have to suddenly worry about IPAM and conflicts with local networks.