7:57 p.m.
Hi,
I just resized the disk image of a virtual machine by following the
recommended virt-resize procedure.
The enlarged disk is working fine, and the size is correctly detected and
used in the virtual machine.
But "virsh vol-info /path/to/imagefile" still shows the old size and
allocation. Is there a way to "fix" this, i.e. making virsh aware of the
new size?
Thanks.
Marco
11:26 p.m.
On 09/12/2014 07:57 AM, Zero Uno wrote:
Hi,
I just resized the disk image of a virtual machine by following the
recommended virt-resize procedure.
The enlarged disk is working fine, and the size is correctly detected
and used in the virtual machine.
But "virsh vol-info /path/to/imagefile" still shows the old size and
allocation. Is there a way to "fix" this, i.e. making virsh aware of the
new size?
Type of volume/pool? Version? Platform? Need just a few more details....
Tks,
John
Thanks.
Marco
_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
4 p.m.
2014-09-12 17:26 GMT+02:00 John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>:
On 09/12/2014 07:57 AM, Zero Uno wrote:
> The enlarged disk is working fine, and the size is correctly
detected
> and used in the virtual machine.
> But "virsh vol-info /path/to/imagefile" still shows the old size and
> allocation. Is there a way to "fix" this, i.e. making virsh aware of the
> new size?
Type of volume/pool? Version? Platform? Need just a few more details....
Hi, sorry for replying so late.
Michal's suggestion (virsh pool-refresh $pool) actually fixed my
problem, vol-info now shows the new capacity and allocation values.
Before trying his suggestion, I noticed that it was showing the old
capacity (10.00 GiB) but it did show the new, larger, allocation
(31,77 GiB), which doesn't make much sense. When I wrote the request
to this list it was still showing the old allocation, too.
Anyway, just for the record: the pool is of type "dir", the volume is
in qcow2 format, the platform is Fedora 19 and here is the version
output:
# virsh version
Compiled against library: libvirt 1.0.5
Using library: libvirt 1.0.5
Using API: QEMU 1.0.5
Running hypervisor: QEMU 1.4.2
Thanks.
Marco
4:11 p.m.
On 12.09.2014 13:57, Zero Uno wrote:
Hi,
I just resized the disk image of a virtual machine by following the
recommended virt-resize procedure.
The enlarged disk is working fine, and the size is correctly detected
and used in the virtual machine.
But "virsh vol-info /path/to/imagefile" still shows the old size and
allocation. Is there a way to "fix" this, i.e. making virsh aware of the
new size?
virsh pool-refresh $pool
may help, where $pool is the name that volume resides in.
Michal
3694
days inactive
3705
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
John Ferlan -
Michal Privoznik -
Zero Uno