7:50 p.m.
Hi,
I would like to ask about status of VDE and libvirt. I found a thread
from http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-February/msg00030.html.
I am not interested in connecting the VDE to the outside world. I have
created a FW machine using macvtap. To this machine I would like to
attach machines from different zones (dmz, prod, cust). I was thinking
on using VDE and vlans (FW would have 1 interface in each vlan -
machines also), but I am not aware how to configure this in libvirt.
I now assume I can do the same setup with regular bridges for the moment
(benefit of VDE would be only 1 switch for many vlans).
Regards,
Robert
--
stereoIT - Open Source Technology Partners
http://www.stereoit.com
mobile: +420 776 762378
4:34 p.m.
New subject: [libvirt-users] Re: [Libvir] libvirt & vde_switch
The 05/04/11, Robert Šmol wrote:
I would like to ask about status of VDE and libvirt. I found a
thread from http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-February/msg00030.html.
AFAIK, vde_switch is still unsupported by libvirt and nobody seems to
work on it these days.
Most people wanting vde_switch (or open vswitch) enough leave libvirt.
I am not interested in connecting the VDE to the outside world. I
have created a FW machine using macvtap. To this machine I would
like to attach machines from different zones (dmz, prod, cust). I
was thinking on using VDE and vlans (FW would have 1 interface in
each vlan - machines also), but I am not aware how to configure this
in libvirt.
I now assume I can do the same setup with regular bridges for the
moment
Yes, this is what I do for now.
(benefit of VDE would be only 1 switch for many vlans).
Plus more features (i.e.: easy virtual switch link between hosts),
maintenance facilities, etc.
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
7:33 p.m.
On 04/06/2011 10:34 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 05/04/11, Robert Šmol wrote:
> I would like to ask about status of VDE and libvirt. I found a
> thread from http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-February/msg00030.html.
AFAIK, vde_switch is still unsupported by libvirt and nobody seems to
work on it these days.
Most people wanting vde_switch (or open vswitch) enough leave libvirt.
On #IRC I got point to message:
http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list@redhat.com/msg32081.html
It seems there is a patch ready. I will test it against 0.9.0. What is
the procedure to get the patch reviewed and eventually get into libvirt?
I mean VMware has vSwitch and it is very powerful.
I'll checkout the vswitch as well.
> I am not interested in connecting the VDE to the outside world.
I
> have created a FW machine using macvtap. To this machine I would
> like to attach machines from different zones (dmz, prod, cust). I
> was thinking on using VDE and vlans (FW would have 1 interface in
> each vlan - machines also), but I am not aware how to configure this
> in libvirt.
>
> I now assume I can do the same setup with regular bridges for the
> moment
Yes, this is what I do for now.
> (benefit of VDE would be only 1 switch for many vlans).
Plus more features (i.e.: easy virtual switch link between hosts),
maintenance facilities, etc.
--
stereoIT - Open Source Technology Partners
http://www.stereoit.com
mobile: +420 776 762378
10 p.m.
New subject: [libvirt-users] Re: [Libvir] libvirt & vde_switch
The 06/04/11, Robert Šmol wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:34 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>The 05/04/11, Robert Šmol wrote:
>
>>I would like to ask about status of VDE and libvirt. I found a
>>thread from
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-February/msg00030.html.
>AFAIK, vde_switch is still unsupported by libvirt and nobody seems to
>work on it these days.
>
>Most people wanting vde_switch (or open vswitch) enough leave libvirt.
>
On #IRC I got point to message:
http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list@redhat.com/msg32081.html
It seems there is a patch ready. I will test it against 0.9.0. What
is the procedure to get the patch reviewed and eventually get into
libvirt?
The patch wasn't merged but the why is a question to the maintainers. I
guess the way it was implemented did not convinced. This is what I
understand from the whole thread, at least.
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
10:13 p.m.
On 04/06/2011 04:00 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 06/04/11, Robert Šmol wrote:
> On 04/06/2011 10:34 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>> The 05/04/11, Robert Šmol wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to ask about status of VDE and libvirt. I found a
>>> thread from
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-February/msg00030.html.
>> AFAIK, vde_switch is still unsupported by libvirt and nobody seems to
>> work on it these days.
>>
>> Most people wanting vde_switch (or open vswitch) enough leave libvirt.
>>
> On #IRC I got point to message:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list@redhat.com/msg32081.html
>
> It seems there is a patch ready. I will test it against 0.9.0. What
> is the procedure to get the patch reviewed and eventually get into
> libvirt?
The patch wasn't merged but the why is a question to the maintainers. I
guess the way it was implemented did not convinced. This is what I
understand from the whole thread, at least.
From the thread it seems the maintainers would like to have a network
based on VDE. To me it also looks like better idea (create vde network
and then just attach the domain to a network.
--
stereoIT - Open Source Technology Partners
http://www.stereoit.com
mobile: +420 776 762378
9:56 p.m.
For my needs I would like to see either vdeswitch or openvswitch
integrated in the project. Is there any preference from the
users/developers on which one of those I should start looking into?
Also I would like to know how this should be integrated, from the mails
I can see devs prefers to have virtual switch present as a network. Can
someone describe how the integration should be done? Support for
additional features like vlan, QoS?
Robert
On 04/06/2011 04:13 PM, Robert Šmol wrote:
On 04/06/2011 04:00 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The 06/04/11, Robert Šmol wrote:
>> On 04/06/2011 10:34 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>>> The 05/04/11, Robert Šmol wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would like to ask about status of VDE and libvirt. I found a
>>>> thread from
>>>> http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-February/msg00030.html.
>>>>
>>> AFAIK, vde_switch is still unsupported by libvirt and nobody seems to
>>> work on it these days.
>>>
>>> Most people wanting vde_switch (or open vswitch) enough leave libvirt.
>>>
>> On #IRC I got point to message:
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list@redhat.com/msg32081.html
>>
>> It seems there is a patch ready. I will test it against 0.9.0. What
>> is the procedure to get the patch reviewed and eventually get into
>> libvirt?
> The patch wasn't merged but the why is a question to the maintainers. I
> guess the way it was implemented did not convinced. This is what I
> understand from the whole thread, at least.
>
From the thread it seems the maintainers would like to have a network
based on VDE. To me it also looks like better idea (create vde network
and then just attach the domain to a network.
--
stereoIT - Open Source Technology Partners
http://www.stereoit.com
mobile: +420 776 762378
10:35 p.m.
On 04/28/2011 09:56 AM, Robert Šmol wrote:
For my needs I would like to see either vdeswitch or openvswitch
integrated in the project. Is there any preference from the
users/developers on which one of those I should start looking into?
Are you volunteering to write some code? :-)
There have been requests for both, and both should eventually be done,
so I guess pick whichever one you like better :-) (since there's already
a patch for VDE, albeit with different XML than we'd like, that may be
quicker to finish.)
You may want to follow development of the work I'll point out below,
though, otherwise you could waste a lot of time.
Also I would like to know how this should be integrated, from the
mails I can see devs prefers to have virtual switch present as a
network. Can someone describe how the integration should be done?
Support for additional features like vlan, QoS?
Once we get into these kinds of questions, it's probably best to switch
to the developers' list (libvir-list(a)redhat.com) to get better exposure
to people writing the code. I'm Cc'ing this message there (and switching
the Reply-To: as well).
In particular, I recently send an RFC to libvir-list proposing an
expansion of the <network> XML to remove the hard-coded connection
between guest interface and host interface for macvtap (type='direct')
interfaces:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-April/msg00591.html
and in a followup message showed how we could expand on this work to
provide support for openvswitch (or vde):
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-April/msg00640.html
I'm planning to have this code finished and tested within the next two
months at most (hopefully considerably earlier). If you're interested in
implementing a <network type='openvswitch'> or <network
type='vde'> you
should subscribe to libvir-list (if you aren't already) so that you can
follow along.
Robert
On 04/06/2011 04:13 PM, Robert Šmol wrote:
>
>
> On 04/06/2011 04:00 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>> The 06/04/11, Robert Šmol wrote:
>>> On 04/06/2011 10:34 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>>>> The 05/04/11, Robert Šmol wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would like to ask about status of VDE and libvirt. I found a
>>>>> thread from
>>>>>
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-February/msg00030.html.
>>>>>
>>>> AFAIK, vde_switch is still unsupported by libvirt and nobody seems to
>>>> work on it these days.
>>>>
>>>> Most people wanting vde_switch (or open vswitch) enough leave
>>>> libvirt.
>>>>
>>> On #IRC I got point to message:
>>>
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list@redhat.com/msg32081.html
>>>
>>> It seems there is a patch ready. I will test it against 0.9.0. What
>>> is the procedure to get the patch reviewed and eventually get into
>>> libvirt?
>> The patch wasn't merged but the why is a question to the maintainers. I
>> guess the way it was implemented did not convinced. This is what I
>> understand from the whole thread, at least.
>>
> From the thread it seems the maintainers would like to have a network
> based on VDE. To me it also looks like better idea (create vde
> network and then just attach the domain to a network.
>
5:28 a.m.
On 04/28/2011 04:35 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 04/28/2011 09:56 AM, Robert Šmol wrote:
> For my needs I would like to see either vdeswitch or openvswitch
> integrated in the project. Is there any preference from the
> users/developers on which one of those I should start looking into?
Are you volunteering to write some code? :-)
There have been requests for both, and both should eventually be done,
so I guess pick whichever one you like better :-) (since there's
already a patch for VDE, albeit with different XML than we'd like,
that may be quicker to finish.)
You may want to follow development of the work I'll point out below,
though, otherwise you could waste a lot of time.
OK, I'll try to start with vde. I've subscribed now to libvirt-list as well.
>
> Also I would like to know how this should be integrated, from the
> mails I can see devs prefers to have virtual switch present as a
> network. Can someone describe how the integration should be done?
> Support for additional features like vlan, QoS?
Once we get into these kinds of questions, it's probably best to
switch to the developers' list (libvir-list(a)redhat.com) to get better
exposure to people writing the code. I'm Cc'ing this message there
(and switching the Reply-To: as well).
In particular, I recently send an RFC to libvir-list proposing an
expansion of the <network> XML to remove the hard-coded connection
between guest interface and host interface for macvtap (type='direct')
interfaces:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-April/msg00591.html
and in a followup message showed how we could expand on this work to
provide support for openvswitch (or vde):
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-April/msg00640.html
I'm planning to have this code finished and tested within the next two
months at most (hopefully considerably earlier). If you're interested
in implementing a <network type='openvswitch'> or <network
type='vde'>
you should subscribe to libvir-list (if you aren't already) so that
you can follow along.
I am now trying to compile the stuff, but I get:
...
CCLD libvirt_driver_nwfilter.la
libtool: link: require no space between `-L' and `/usr/lib'
make[3]: *** [libvirt_driver_nwfilter.la] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rsmol/Code/libvirt/src'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/rsmol/Code/libvirt/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rsmol/Code/libvirt'
make: *** [all] Error 2
...
But I'll figure out eventually.
>
> Robert
>
> On 04/06/2011 04:13 PM, Robert Šmol wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/06/2011 04:00 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>>> The 06/04/11, Robert Šmol wrote:
>>>> On 04/06/2011 10:34 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>>>>> The 05/04/11, Robert Šmol wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to ask about status of VDE and libvirt. I found a
>>>>>> thread from
>>>>>>
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2008-February/msg00030.html.
>>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIK, vde_switch is still unsupported by libvirt and nobody
>>>>> seems to
>>>>> work on it these days.
>>>>>
>>>>> Most people wanting vde_switch (or open vswitch) enough leave
>>>>> libvirt.
>>>>>
>>>> On #IRC I got point to message:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list@redhat.com/msg32081.html
>>>>
>>>> It seems there is a patch ready. I will test it against 0.9.0. What
>>>> is the procedure to get the patch reviewed and eventually get into
>>>> libvirt?
>>> The patch wasn't merged but the why is a question to the
>>> maintainers. I
>>> guess the way it was implemented did not convinced. This is what I
>>> understand from the whole thread, at least.
>>>
>> From the thread it seems the maintainers would like to have a
>> network based on VDE. To me it also looks like better idea (create
>> vde network and then just attach the domain to a network.
>>
>
--
stereoIT - Open Source Technology Partners
http://www.stereoit.com
mobile: +420 776 762378
2:28 p.m.
New subject: [libvirt-users] [libvirt] [Libvir] libvirt & vde_switch
2011/5/1 Robert Šmol <robert.smol(a)stereoit.com>:
I am now trying to compile the stuff, but I get:
...
CCLD libvirt_driver_nwfilter.la
libtool: link: require no space between `-L' and `/usr/lib'
make[3]: *** [libvirt_driver_nwfilter.la] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rsmol/Code/libvirt/src'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/rsmol/Code/libvirt/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rsmol/Code/libvirt'
make: *** [all] Error 2
...
But I'll figure out eventually.
libtool tells you that if found '-L /usr/lib' in the commandline, but
it would like to see '-L/usr/lib' (without the space). Typically this
comes from a "broken" pkg-config file from one of the libraries
libvirt depends on.
Run 'make V=1' to make it print the complete commandlines, this might
help figuring out from which library the problem comes.
Matthias
5:21 p.m.
New subject: [libvirt-users] [libvirt] [Libvir] libvirt & vde_switch
On 05/02/2011 08:28 AM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
2011/5/1 Robert Šmol<robert.smol(a)stereoit.com>:
> I am now trying to compile the stuff, but I get:
> ...
> CCLD libvirt_driver_nwfilter.la
> libtool: link: require no space between `-L' and `/usr/lib'
> make[3]: *** [libvirt_driver_nwfilter.la] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rsmol/Code/libvirt/src'
> make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/rsmol/Code/libvirt/src'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rsmol/Code/libvirt'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> ...
>
> But I'll figure out eventually.
libtool tells you that if found '-L /usr/lib' in the commandline, but
it would like to see '-L/usr/lib' (without the space). Typically this
comes from a "broken" pkg-config file from one of the libraries
libvirt depends on.
Run 'make V=1' to make it print the complete commandlines, this might
help figuring out from which library the problem comes.
Matthias
rsmol@laptop:~/Code/libvirt (git:master)$ pcap-config --libs
-L /usr/lib -lpcap
I filled #775433 on ubuntu for pcap-config. modified pcap-config and now
I can compile the libvirt just fine. Moving on.
Robert
--
stereoIT - Open Source Technology Partners
http://www.stereoit.com
mobile: +420 776 762378
4934
days inactive
4961
days old
9 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Laine Stump -
Matthias Bolte -
Nicolas Sebrecht -
Robert Šmol