3:03 p.m.
Hi,
Looking into a bug in vagrant-libvirt where an error during the update will
cause the domain to be completely discarded.
https://github.com/vagrant-libvirt/vagrant-libvirt/issues/949
Basically I think it stems from doing an undefine -> create with XML new
process, which if there is an issue with the new XML due to KVM module not
loaded or something similar it will be rejected, but unfortunately it is
also unlikely to allow the old definition to be restored either.
I'm looking around to try and see if there is an API (specfically in
ruby-libvirt) for updating the domain definition, so that if the new XML is
rejected at least the old definition remains, and so far I'm drawing a
blank.
Is the only option here to write using a temporary domain name, then remove
the old domain and rename the new definition to the old domain?
Or have I missed the obvious API analogous to the edit functionality?
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - unknown
3:34 p.m.
On 5/12/22 4:03 PM, Darragh Bailey wrote:
Hi,
Looking into a bug in vagrant-libvirt where an error during the update
will cause the domain to be completely discarded.
https://github.com/vagrant-libvirt/vagrant-libvirt/issues/949
<https://github.com/vagrant-libvirt/vagrant-libvirt/issues/949>
Basically I think it stems from doing an undefine -> create with XML new
process, which if there is an issue with the new XML due to KVM module
not loaded or something similar it will be rejected, but unfortunately
it is also unlikely to allow the old definition to be restored either.
I'm looking around to try and see if there is an API (specfically in
ruby-libvirt) for updating the domain definition, so that if the new XML
is rejected at least the old definition remains, and so far I'm drawing
a blank.
Is the only option here to write using a temporary domain name, then
remove the old domain and rename the new definition to the old domain?
Or have I missed the obvious API analogous to the edit functionality?
The virDomainDefineXMLFlags API (and also the older/deprecated
virDomainDefineXML API) doesn't require that the domain first be
undefined (with one notable exception - see below[*]). If you define a
domain that already exists with the same name and uuid, then the effect
is to "redefine" (or "update" if you prefer) the existing domain of
that
name. If the domain is currently active, then the changes will take
effect the next time the domain is shut down ("Destroy"ed in libvirt API
parlance) and re-started.
If any error is encountered during this redefinition, then no changes
are made to the existing domain definition.
[*]The exception to this - if you attempt to Define a domain that has
the same name or uuid as an existing domain, but the uuid/name is
different, that is an error.
6:17 p.m.
Hi,
On Thu 12 May 2022, 21:34 Laine Stump, <laine(a)redhat.com> wrote:
The virDomainDefineXMLFlags API (and also the older/deprecated
virDomainDefineXML API) doesn't require that the domain first be
undefined (with one notable exception - see below[*]). If you define a
domain that already exists with the same name and uuid, then the effect
is to "redefine" (or "update" if you prefer) the existing domain of
that
name. If the domain is currently active, then the changes will take
effect the next time the domain is shut down ("Destroy"ed in libvirt API
parlance) and re-started.
That makes it much easier, and makes what the code was previously doing
rather stupid. Probably a case that I never thought to read the API doc for
virDomainDefineXML
If any error is encountered during this redefinition, then no changes
are made to the existing domain definition.
That is the ideal behaviour
[*]The exception to this - if you attempt to Define a domain that has
the same name or uuid as an existing domain, but the uuid/name is
different, that is an error.
Are there any gotchas/limitations dealing with NVRAM when redefining
domains that I should be aware of? Typically setting some flags to allow
the undefine to work as expected, just not clear whether a NVRAM file could
be orphaned by updating the domain XML, or if a reference will be
maintained so if a domain once had NVRAM it's necessary to pass the flag to
remove on undefine. Hopefully nget to test around some of this later, just
not sure I know enough to ensure I check all behaviours.
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - unknown
2:23 p.m.
On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 00:17, Darragh Bailey <daragh.bailey(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu 12 May 2022, 21:34 Laine Stump, <laine(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> The virDomainDefineXMLFlags API (and also the older/deprecated
> virDomainDefineXML API) doesn't require that the domain first be
> undefined (with one notable exception - see below[*]). If you define a
> domain that already exists with the same name and uuid, then the effect
> is to "redefine" (or "update" if you prefer) the existing domain
of that
> name. If the domain is currently active, then the changes will take
> effect the next time the domain is shut down ("Destroy"ed in libvirt API
> parlance) and re-started.
>
Unfortunately trying to call this via ruby-libvirt doesn't appear to behave
as expected. It appears that if I add an nvram element without a loader
element to the os block, the following code block will execute without
issue but also without changing the domain XML:
# Apply XML changes directly
if descr_changed
begin
env[:ui].info("Updating domain definition due to configuration change")
new_descr = String.new
xml_descr.write new_descr
# env[:machine].provider.driver.connection.client provides access to
the ruby-libvirt connection object
libvirt_domain =
env[:machine].provider.driver.connection.client.define_domain_xml(new_descr,
1)
domain =
env[:machine].provider.driver.connection.servers.get(env[:machine].id.to_s)
rescue Fog::Errors::Error => e
raise Errors::UpdateServerError, error_message: e.message
end
end
I've by-passing the fog-libvirt to call the ruby-libvirt connection object
directly to try and avoid any unexpected interference when testing the API
call out e.g.
https://libvirt.org/ruby/api/Libvirt/Connect.html#method-i-define_domain_xml
So not only is there no exception thrown if the XML change is ignored, I've
noticed there doesn't appear to be an easy way to check using the API
either, in that
https://libvirt.org/ruby/api/Libvirt/Domain.html#method-i-updated-3F
doesn't indicate that the domain has been updated whether I call it on the
libvirt_domain object returned, or an instance from before the
define_domain_xml call is made.
It appears that the only way is to perform a call to get the xml definition
of the libvirt_domain object returned in the above block and see if that
matches the xml that was sent, if not, error.
Is this the expected usage of the API? Or should the call to
define_domain_xml raise an exception if it cannot update the domain XML? as
opposed to a schema validation error which does appear to be detected when
I did something stupid.
--
Darragh
3:11 p.m.
On 5/14/22 3:23 PM, Darragh Bailey wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 00:17, Darragh Bailey <daragh.bailey(a)gmail.com
<mailto:daragh.bailey@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu 12 May 2022, 21:34 Laine Stump, <laine(a)redhat.com
<mailto:laine@redhat.com>> wrote:
The virDomainDefineXMLFlags API (and also the older/deprecated
virDomainDefineXML API) doesn't require that the domain first be
undefined (with one notable exception - see below[*]). If you
define a
domain that already exists with the same name and uuid, then the
effect
is to "redefine" (or "update" if you prefer) the existing
domain
of that
name. If the domain is currently active, then the changes will take
effect the next time the domain is shut down ("Destroy"ed in
libvirt API
parlance) and re-started.
Unfortunately trying to call this via ruby-libvirt doesn't appear to
behave as expected. It appears that if I add an nvram element without a
loader element to the os block, the following code block will execute
without issue but also without changing the domain XML:
# Apply XML changes directly
if descr_changed
begin
env[:ui].info("Updating domain definition due to configuration change")
new_descr = String.new
xml_descr.write new_descr
# env[:machine].provider.driver.connection.client provides access
to the ruby-libvirt connection object
libvirt_domain =
env[:machine].provider.driver.connection.client.define_domain_xml(new_descr,
1)
domain =
env[:machine].provider.driver.connection.servers.get(env[:machine].id.to_s)
rescue Fog::Errors::Error => e
raise Errors::UpdateServerError, error_message: e.message
end
end
I've by-passing the fog-libvirt to call the ruby-libvirt connection
object directly to try and avoid any unexpected interference when
testing the API call out e.g.
https://libvirt.org/ruby/api/Libvirt/Connect.html#method-i-define_domain_xml
<https://libvirt.org/ruby/api/Libvirt/Connect.html#method-i-define_domain_...
So not only is there no exception thrown if the XML change is ignored,
I've noticed there doesn't appear to be an easy way to check using the
API either, in that
https://libvirt.org/ruby/api/Libvirt/Domain.html#method-i-updated-3F
<https://libvirt.org/ruby/api/Libvirt/Domain.html#method-i-updated-3F>
doesn't indicate that the domain has been updated whether I call it on
the libvirt_domain object returned, or an instance from before the
define_domain_xml call is made.
It appears that the only way is to perform a call to get the xml
definition of the libvirt_domain object returned in the above block and
see if that matches the xml that was sent, if not, error.
Is this the expected usage of the API? Or should the call to
define_domain_xml raise an exception if it cannot update the domain XML?
as opposed to a schema validation error which does appear to be detected
when I did something stupid.
Caveat - I'm completely unfamiliar with ruby and the libvirt-ruby API
bindings.
If there is a problem that causes the domain config to not be updated,
libvirt will return an error. So I would suspect one of the two things
is happening:
1) there may be a problem in the libvirt-ruby bindings that causes the
error reported by the call (in whatever C code is behind the ruby
bindings) to libvirt to be properly propagated to ruby. I would hope
this isn't the case, but "bugs happen", so it should be considered as a
possibility.
2) As I said in my earlier mail, any changes that are made will take
effect the next time the domain is destroyed and restarted. This also
means that the changes won't be reflected in the "live/status" XML of
the domain until that time. If you want to see the new configuration
after you've made changes, you should add the VIR_DOMAIN_XML_INACTIVE
flag when requesting the domain XML. Possibly you haven't included this
flag, and that's why you think that your change hasn't taken effect?
5:42 p.m.
Hi,
On Sat 14 May 2022, 21:11 Laine Stump, <laine(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Caveat - I'm completely unfamiliar with ruby and the libvirt-ruby
API
bindings.
If there is a problem that causes the domain config to not be updated,
libvirt will return an error. So I would suspect one of the two things
is happening:
Thanks, that's what I was expecting should happen, just wanted to be sure
that there wasn't some other behaviour in place for compatibility reasons.
1) there may be a problem in the libvirt-ruby bindings that causes the
error reported by the call (in whatever C code is behind the ruby
bindings) to libvirt to be properly propagated to ruby. I would hope
this isn't the case, but "bugs happen", so it should be considered as a
possibility.
A quick look suggests that the code looks to raise an exception if the dom
pointer returned is NULL, so I think the bindings are correct. But I will
check that what version of ruby-libvirt I have installed matches the source
code I'm looked at.
2) As I said in my earlier mail, any changes that are made will take
effect the next time the domain is destroyed and restarted. This
also
means that the changes won't be reflected in the "live/status" XML of
the domain until that time. If you want to see the new configuration
after you've made changes, you should add the VIR_DOMAIN_XML_INACTIVE
flag when requesting the domain XML. Possibly you haven't included this
flag, and that's why you think that your change hasn't taken effect?
Ah, I forgot to outline where in the lifecycle the update is taking place.
The domain isn't running when the code attempts to update the definition.
Does that still mean that the VIR_DOMAIN_XML_INACTIVE flag is needed? I was
assuming when the domain is inactive the XML changes would be reflected
immediately.
Oddly I thought during some experiments when the added NVRAM XML element
was ignored, the updated number of CPUs which was in the same XML
definition passed in was applied.
Will dig further tomorrow or Monday on the version of ruby-libvirt
installed into my rvm dev env as well as checking passing in the flag.
I'm sure it'll turn out to be something obvious that I'm overlooking.
Thanks,
--
Darragh
6:19 a.m.
Hi,
On Sat, 14 May 2022 at 23:42, Darragh Bailey <daragh.bailey(a)gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat 14 May 2022, 21:11 Laine Stump, <laine(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Caveat - I'm completely unfamiliar with ruby and the libvirt-ruby API
> bindings.
> If there is a problem that causes the domain config to not
be updated,
> libvirt will return an error. So I would suspect one of the two things
> is happening:
Looks like I've stumbled across an edge case here
regarding domain config
not being fully updated but also not returning an error.
1) there may be a problem in the libvirt-ruby bindings that causes
the
> error reported by the call (in whatever C code is behind the ruby
> bindings) to libvirt to be properly propagated to ruby. I would hope
> this isn't the case, but "bugs happen", so it should be considered as
a
> possibility.
I decided to test the behaviour slightly more directly
via virsh rather
than through the ruby bindings and based on replicating the same there, and
a review of the ruby binding API code, I believe the binding code is
working fine, the problem is unexpected behaviour in libvirt.
It appears that if the XML passed in contains an nvram XML tag without a
corresponding loader tag, then the nvram tag will be dropped without an
error. In fact if you change any other information such as the vcpu
definition in the same update, that will still be applied while the nvram
tag is ignored.
Simply the reason the ruby code isn't raising an exception is that libvirt
thinks nothing went wrong and is returning a non null pointer.
Put together a gist to make it easier to show what I'm seeing
https://gist.github.com/electrofelix/6f66714c14a0d6e3b1078037aadae398
I'm assuming at this point that this is a bug, the domain XML in
test_with_nvram.xml should be rejected because it's not all applied.
--
Darragh
9:45 a.m.
On 5/14/22 6:42 PM, Darragh Bailey wrote:
Hi,
On Sat 14 May 2022, 21:11 Laine Stump, <laine(a)redhat.com
<mailto:laine@redhat.com>> wrote:
Caveat - I'm completely unfamiliar with ruby and the libvirt-ruby API
bindings.
If there is a problem that causes the domain config to not be updated,
libvirt will return an error. So I would suspect one of the two things
is happening:
Thanks, that's what I was expecting should happen, just wanted to be
sure that there wasn't some other behaviour in place for compatibility
reasons.
1) there may be a problem in the libvirt-ruby bindings that causes the
error reported by the call (in whatever C code is behind the ruby
bindings) to libvirt to be properly propagated to ruby. I would hope
this isn't the case, but "bugs happen", so it should be considered as
a
possibility.
A quick look suggests that the code looks to raise an exception if the
dom pointer returned is NULL, so I think the bindings are correct. But I
will check that what version of ruby-libvirt I have installed matches
the source code I'm looked at.
2) As I said in my earlier mail, any changes that are made will take
effect the next time the domain is destroyed and restarted. This also
means that the changes won't be reflected in the "live/status" XML of
the domain until that time. If you want to see the new configuration
after you've made changes, you should add the VIR_DOMAIN_XML_INACTIVE
flag when requesting the domain XML. Possibly you haven't included this
flag, and that's why you think that your change hasn't taken effect?
Ah, I forgot to outline where in the lifecycle the update is taking
place. The domain isn't running when the code attempts to update the
definition.
Does that still mean that the VIR_DOMAIN_XML_INACTIVE flag is needed? I
was assuming when the domain is inactive the XML changes would be
reflected immediately.
No, your thinking was correct - if the domain isn't active, then the
change should take effect immediately, and there is no difference
whether or not you have VIR_DOMAIN_XML_INACTIVE.
I've never done anything directly with the nvram setting (just accepted
whatever virt-manager put in there), but from your other message, it
sounds like you've found a bonafide libvirt bug (either that, or I just
don't know enough about how the nvram settings work :-)). Can you file
an issue at https://gitlab.com/groups/libvirt/-/issues ?
Oddly I thought during some experiments when the added NVRAM XML element
was ignored, the updated number of CPUs which was in the same XML
definition passed in was applied.
Another indication that it's a bug - updates to the domain config are
always an all-or-nothing thing.
Will dig further tomorrow or Monday on the version of ruby-libvirt
installed into my rvm dev env as well as checking passing in the flag.
I'm sure it'll turn out to be something obvious that I'm overlooking.
Thanks,
--
Darragh
4:10 a.m.
On 5/14/22 21:23, Darragh Bailey wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 00:17, Darragh Bailey <daragh.bailey(a)gmail.com
<mailto:daragh.bailey@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu 12 May 2022, 21:34 Laine Stump, <laine(a)redhat.com
<mailto:laine@redhat.com>> wrote:
The virDomainDefineXMLFlags API (and also the older/deprecated
virDomainDefineXML API) doesn't require that the domain first be
undefined (with one notable exception - see below[*]). If you
define a
domain that already exists with the same name and uuid, then the
effect
is to "redefine" (or "update" if you prefer) the existing
domain
of that
name. If the domain is currently active, then the changes will take
effect the next time the domain is shut down ("Destroy"ed in
libvirt API
parlance) and re-started.
Unfortunately trying to call this via ruby-libvirt doesn't appear to
behave as expected. It appears that if I add an nvram element without a
loader element to the os block, the following code block will execute
without issue but also without changing the domain XML:
I think that's kind of expected. If you take a look how libvirt parses
that part of XML:
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/blob/master/src/conf/domain_conf.c#L...
if no <loader/> is found then the function exits early without looking
at <nvram/> at all. It kind of makes sense - what good does nvram do
without loader?
Michal
5:46 a.m.
On Mon 16 May 2022, 10:10 Michal Prívozník, <mprivozn(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/14/22 21:23, Darragh Bailey wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 00:17, Darragh Bailey <daragh.bailey(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:daragh.bailey@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately trying to call this via ruby-libvirt doesn't appear to
> behave as expected. It appears that if I add an nvram element without a
> loader element to the os block, the following code block will execute
> without issue but also without changing the domain XML:
I think that's kind of expected. If you take a look how libvirt parses
that part of XML:
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/blob/master/src/conf/domain_conf.c#L...
if no <loader/> is found then the function exits early without looking
at <nvram/> at all. It kind of makes sense - what good does nvram do
without loader?
I don't know, I realised that there was a bug in our vagrant-libvirt in
that it should be checking for both loader and NVRAM config settings to be
passed in if the end user was updating the machine config. And subsequently
set both elements or neither.
However I was not expecting the silent discarding of the XML element and
instead to get an error saying that an nvram XML element without a loader
XML element is invalid and for the entire request to be rejected. Basically
that the provided XML domain definition was invalid.
Based on the previous explanation of how the define_domain_xml should work
along with the response on the example reproducer this seems like a bug.
Does your reply mean this is expected behaviour? Or were you looking for
clarification on what I expected to see?
--
Darragh Bailey
6:30 a.m.
On 5/16/22 12:46, Darragh Bailey wrote:
On Mon 16 May 2022, 10:10 Michal Prívozník, <mprivozn(a)redhat.com
<mailto:mprivozn@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 5/14/22 21:23, Darragh Bailey wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 00:17, Darragh Bailey
<daragh.bailey(a)gmail.com <mailto:daragh.bailey@gmail.com>
> <mailto:daragh.bailey@gmail.com
<mailto:daragh.bailey@gmail.com>>>
wrote:
>
> Unfortunately trying to call this via ruby-libvirt doesn't appear to
> behave as expected. It appears that if I add an nvram element
without a
> loader element to the os block, the following code block will execute
> without issue but also without changing the domain XML:
I think that's kind of expected. If you take a look how libvirt parses
that part of XML:
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/blob/master/src/conf/domain_conf.c#L...
<https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/blob/master/src/conf/domain_conf.c#L...
if no <loader/> is found then the function exits early without looking
at <nvram/> at all. It kind of makes sense - what good does nvram do
without loader?
I don't know, I realised that there was a bug in our vagrant-libvirt in
that it should be checking for both loader and NVRAM config settings to
be passed in if the end user was updating the machine config. And
subsequently set both elements or neither.
However I was not expecting the silent discarding of the XML element and
instead to get an error saying that an nvram XML element without a
loader XML element is invalid and for the entire request to be rejected.
Basically that the provided XML domain definition was invalid.
Based on the previous explanation of how the define_domain_xml should
work along with the response on the example reproducer this seems like a
bug.
Does your reply mean this is expected behaviour? Or were you looking for
clarification on what I expected to see?
I mean, fixing this particular problem is trivial. But what's not as
trivial is fixing ALL occurrences of this problem (where an
attribute/element is ignored because of something we've parsed earlier).
Mostly because we don't know what those are.
BTW: Have you spotted the other demonstration of this problem (in the
same function)? Yes, if fw autoselection is enabled (<os
firmware='something'>) then <nvram template=''/> is ignored.
Anyway, there used to be an unwritten agreement with users that they get
XML of a domain they just defined to see if it contains everything they
want. This is used to be because different drivers support different
features. But I guess it's hard to argue with an unwritten rule esp. if
it's not known to everybody.
Michal
7:52 a.m.
On Mon, 16 May 2022 at 12:30, Michal Prívozník <mprivozn(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I mean, fixing this particular problem is trivial. But what's not
as
trivial is fixing ALL occurrences of this problem (where an
attribute/element is ignored because of something we've parsed earlier).
Mostly because we don't know what those are.
tbf, this is the clarification I needed. I was previously operating under
the
assumption that given the description define_domain_xml was checking
if the resulting XML for the domain matched what was passed in.
BTW: Have you spotted the other demonstration of this problem (in
the
same function)? Yes, if fw autoselection is enabled (<os
firmware='something'>) then <nvram template=''/> is ignored.
No, I think it was probably a bit of a fluck that I hit the issue as I was
looking
at trying to avoid the special handling around nvram with the current code
undefining a domain before creating the new definition. Could easily have
missed it altogether.
Anyway, there used to be an unwritten agreement with users that they
get
XML of a domain they just defined to see if it contains everything they
want. This is used to be because different drivers support different
features. But I guess it's hard to argue with an unwritten rule esp. if
it's not known to everybody.
Michal
I had started to lean towards checking the XML for the domain returned as
a final validation step.Perhaps the API docs for
https://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainDefineXML and
https://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainDefineXMLFlags
could mention that it doesnot guarantee that the entire XML document has
been applied to the domain?
So perhaps this is less a bug with the loader/nvram XML element handling
and more a documentation bug and a possible enhancement that possibly
the virDomainDefineXMLFlags could consider accepting a flag to verify the
returned domain XML is equivalent as a general fix for those applications
that would find this useful?
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
8:31 a.m.
On 5/16/22 14:52, Darragh Bailey wrote:
So perhaps this is less a bug with the loader/nvram XML element
handling
and more a documentation bug and a possible enhancement that possibly
the virDomainDefineXMLFlags could consider accepting a flag to verify the
returned domain XML is equivalent as a general fix for those applications
that would find this useful?
Yes to the first part, but no the second. Comparing XMLs is not as easy
as you would think. For instance:
<domain id='1' type='kvm'>
<uuid>123456</uuid>
<name>myGuest</name>
</domain>
<domain type='kvm' id='1'>
<name>myGuest</uuid>
<uuid>123456</uuid>
</domain>
The former is just an example of possible user input, the latter is how
libvirt would format it. Obviously, these XMLs are equivalent, but not
stcmp() equal.
Michal
2:29 a.m.
On Mon 16 May 2022, 14:32 Michal Prívozník, <mprivozn(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/16/22 14:52, Darragh Bailey wrote:
> So perhaps this is less a bug with the loader/nvram XML element handling
> and more a documentation bug and a possible enhancement that possibly
> the virDomainDefineXMLFlags could consider accepting a flag to verify the
> returned domain XML is equivalent as a general fix for those applications
> that would find this useful?
Yes to the first part, but no the second. Comparing XMLs is not as easy
as you would think. For instance:
<domain id='1' type='kvm'>
<uuid>123456</uuid>
<name>myGuest</name>
</domain>
<domain type='kvm' id='1'>
<name>myGuest</uuid>
<uuid>123456</uuid>
</domain>
The former is just an example of possible user input, the latter is how
libvirt would format it. Obviously, these XMLs are equivalent, but not
stcmp() equal.
I'm familiar with the fun of checking for equivalence, I was hoping that as
libvirt was working with XML it might already be using a library that could
handle this. A quick look at libxml2 suggests it's been left up to the
consumer to implement.
So each project that becomes aware of this behaviour will have to find a
library to do the comparison or implement it directly themselves.
--
Darragh Bailey
923
days inactive
928
days old
13 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Darragh Bailey -
Laine Stump -
Michal Prívozník