6:44 p.m.
Hey guys,
I'm so glad you added the new set of virConnectListAllDomains functions, it
simplifies a lot our work!. I was only wondering why there is no support
for PowerVM. Is it that it hasn't been developed or is there some technical
hardship?
Best,
Camilo Aguilar
9:18 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 07:44:47PM -0500, Camilo Aguilar wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm so glad you added the new set of virConnectListAllDomains functions, it
simplifies a lot our work!. I was only wondering why there is no support
for PowerVM. Is it that it hasn't been developed or is there some technical
hardship?
I believe it was probably just an oversight - our intention was that the
new API worked with all drivers. Feel free to send a patch for phyp if
you think you can manage to write the code.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
9:35 p.m.
I'm writing Go bindings, I was just wondering about PowerVM, maybe further
ahead if nobody has done it I could give it a try. So, Does it mean the
other functions more granular funtions are going to be deprecated at some
point?
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com>wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 07:44:47PM -0500, Camilo Aguilar wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I'm so glad you added the new set of virConnectListAllDomains functions,
it
> simplifies a lot our work!. I was only wondering why there is no support
> for PowerVM. Is it that it hasn't been developed or is there some
technical
> hardship?
I believe it was probably just an oversight - our intention was that the
new API worked with all drivers. Feel free to send a patch for phyp if
you think you can manage to write the code.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/:|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org:|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/:|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc:|
9:40 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:35:10PM -0500, Camilo Aguilar wrote:
I'm writing Go bindings, I was just wondering about PowerVM,
maybe further
ahead if nobody has done it I could give it a try. So, Does it mean the
other functions more granular funtions are going to be deprecated at some
point?
Libvirt generally doesn't have any policy of explicitly deprecating
things unless they were totally broken by design. We just recommend
people use the best API that suits their needs. We certainly will not
ever remove any APIs either.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
4065
days inactive
4065
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Camilo Aguilar -
Daniel P. Berrange