重启服务器后,root下virt-manager能执行了,我看你的帐号还不行。
发件人: Allen Qiu [mailto:my1stbox@163.com]
发送时间: 2014年10月27日 16:31
收件人: libvirt-users(a)redhat.com
抄送: 王成武; 'Bin Liu'; zoubinbin100(a)163.com
主题: What is the difference between running "virt-manager" and "sudo
virt-manager"?
Hi all,
What is the difference between starting virt-manager by "virt-manager" and by
"sudo virt-manager"? It seems that there are two copy of virt-manager running in
the background.
When I run "virt-manager", I got a error of "Unable to open a connection to
the libvirt management daemon. Libvirt URI is: qemu:///system Verify that: - The
'libvirtd' daemon has been started".
Whereas when I run "sudo virt-manager", I got a error of "Error starting
Virtual Machine Manager: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are
that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a
system crash. See <
http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/>
http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information."
How should I deal with the two issues respectively? Is there any drawback by simply
running "virt-manager"?
Regards,
Allen
2014-10-27
_____
Allen Qiu