3:36 p.m.
Dear Adam
First we were using a python script that was working on 4 threads and
therefore removing 4 snapshots at the time throughout the cluster, that
still caused problems.
Now i took the snapshot removing out of the threaded part an i am just
looping through each snapshot on each VM one after another, even with
³sleeps² inbetween, but the problem remains.
But i am getting the impression that it is a problem with the amount of
snapshots that are deleted in a certain time, if i delete manually and one
after another (meaning every 10 min or so) i do not have problems, if i
delete manually and do several at once and on one VM the next one just
after one finished, the risk seems to increase.
I do not think it is the number of VMS because we had this on hosts with
only 3 or 4 Vms running
I will try restarting the libvirt and see what happens.
We are not using RHEL 7.1 only CentOS 7.1
Is there anything else we can look at when this happens again ?
Regards
Soeren
On 02/06/15 18:53, "Adam Litke" <alitke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hello Soeren.
I've started to look at this issue and I'd agree that at first glance
it looks like a libvirt issue. The 'cannot acquire state change lock'
messages suggest a locking bug or severe contention at least. To help
me better understand the problem I have a few questions about your
setup.
From your earlier report it appears that you have 15 VMs running on
the failing host. Are you attempting to remove snapshots from all VMs
at the same time? Have you tried with fewer concurrent operations?
I'd be curious to understand if the problem is connected to the
number of VMs running or the number of active block jobs.
Have you tried RHEL-7.1 as a hypervisor host?
Rather than rebooting the host, does restarting libvirtd cause the VMs
to become responsive again? Note that this operation may cause the
host to move to Unresponsive state in the UI for a short period of
time.
Thanks for your report.
On 31/05/15 23:39 +0000, Soeren Malchow wrote:
>And sorry, another update, it does kill the VM partly, it was still
>pingable when i wrote the last mail, but no ssh and no spice console
>possible
>
>From: Soeren Malchow
><soeren.malchow@mcon.net<mailto:soeren.malchow@mcon.net>>
>Date: Monday 1 June 2015 01:35
>To: Soeren Malchow
><soeren.malchow@mcon.net<mailto:soeren.malchow@mcon.net>>,
>"libvirt-users@redhat.com<mailto:libvirt-users@redhat.com>"
><libvirt-users@redhat.com<mailto:libvirt-users@redhat.com>>, users
><users@ovirt.org<mailto:users@ovirt.org>>
>Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Bug in Snapshot Removing
>
>Small addition again:
>
>This error shows up in the log while removing snapshots WITHOUT
>rendering the Vms unresponsive
>
>‹
>Jun 01 01:33:45 mc-dc3ham-compute-02-live.mc.mcon.net libvirtd[1657]:
>Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock
>Jun 01 01:33:45 mc-dc3ham-compute-02-live.mc.mcon.net vdsm[6839]: vdsm
>vm.Vm ERROR vmId=`56848f4a-cd73-4eda-bf79-7eb80ae569a9`::Error getting
>block job info
>
>Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
>"/usr/share/vdsm/virt/vm.py", line 5759, in queryBlockJobsŠ
>
>‹
>
>
>
>From: Soeren Malchow
><soeren.malchow@mcon.net<mailto:soeren.malchow@mcon.net>>
>Date: Monday 1 June 2015 00:56
>To: "libvirt-users@redhat.com<mailto:libvirt-users@redhat.com>"
><libvirt-users@redhat.com<mailto:libvirt-users@redhat.com>>, users
><users@ovirt.org<mailto:users@ovirt.org>>
>Subject: [ovirt-users] Bug in Snapshot Removing
>
>Dear all
>
>I am not sure if the mail just did not get any attention between all the
>mails and this time it is also going to the libvirt mailing list.
>
>I am experiencing a problem with VM becoming unresponsive when removing
>Snapshots (Live Merge) and i think there is a serious problem.
>
>Here are the previous mails,
>
>http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2015-May/033083.html
>
>The problem is on a system with everything on the latest version, CentOS
>7.1 and ovirt 3.5.2.1 all upgrades applied.
>
>This Problem did NOT exist before upgrading to CentOS 7.1 with an
>environment running ovirt 3.5.0 and 3.5.1 and Fedora 20 with the
>libvirt-preview repo activated.
>
>I think this is a bug in libvirt, not ovirt itself, but i am not sure.
>The actual file throwing the exception is in VDSM
>(/usr/share/vdsm/virt/vm.py, line 697).
>
>We are very willing to help, test and supply log files in anyway we can.
>
>Regards
>Soeren
>
>_______________________________________________
>Users mailing list
>Users(a)ovirt.org
>http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Adam Litke