Re: [libvirt-users] Performance tuning questions for mail server
On 10/7/11, Alex <mysqlstudent(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The only thing I haven't done from above is to use ionice on
mail
processes. I'm using RAID5 across three 1TB SATA3 disks,
RAID 5 is another major bottleneck there. The commonly cited write
penalty for RAID 5 appears to be 4 IOPS, while RAID 1/10 is 2 IOPS.
Due to the typical load on an email server with more writes than read,
this become rather punishing.
So you might see a major improvement simply by adding another 1TB and
going for RAID 10.
Personally because of that, as well as the headache of recovering from
a RAID 5 disaster, I've stopped using RAID 5 especially since the cost
of drives are really cheap.
I'm using
deadline scheduler, the /var partition is mounted noatime, and the
disk is mounted raw:
<disk type='file' device='disk'>
<driver name='qemu' type='raw'/>
<source file='/var/lib/libvirt/images/mail02.img'/>
<target dev='vda' bus='virtio'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00'
slot='0x05'
function='0x0'/>
I meant raw disk devices rather than files e.g.
<disk type='block' device='disk'>
<driver name='qemu' type='raw' cache='none'/>
<source dev='/dev/server02_vg1_2tb/lv_vm03_swap'/>
<target dev='vdb' bus='virtio'/>
</disk>
This eliminates one layer of filesystem overheads.
How do I configure BIND to ignore TTLs and keep everything for five
minutes, as suggested?
I'm not too sure about this sorry.