Hi everyone, I'm forwarding this mail that I wrote to OpenVSwitch dev
list because I think that you could maybe help me a little :-)
What did you think about the patch to libvirt that I'm using?. At
least, it worked for me :-)
Thanks.
Ernesto
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ernesto Domato <edomat(a)gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:09 PM
Subject: OpenVSwitch and libvirt integration problem at shutdown/reboot
To: dev(a)openvswitch.org
Hi everyone, this mail is related to a bug report that I did on Debian
(#701760) that I wasn't able to resolve yet and want to know if
someone has the same problem and how could I fix it.
The problem that I'm having is that on shutdown/reboot of the machine
that holds the virtual machines that use OVS, the OVS-Switch is going
down before libvirt finish to shutdown the VMs.
This cause that libvirt can¡t unregister the virtual interface from
the OVS-Switch and it hangs the shutdown/reboot process. The only way
that I have to solve this at that point is to log in by SSH and
restart the OVS-Switch so libvirt can finish unregistering the
interfaces and the system continue with the task asked.
What I tried too is to patch the libvirt to use the --no-wait flag for
ovs-vsctl command that deletes the virtual interface so it doesn't
hang when OVS-Switch isn't running. It worked on the sense that the
system does shutdown/reboot but next time it boot, the VMs stop
responding, I have to delete the virtual interface from OVS-Switch and
register it again and then the VM start responding again. I guess that
this happens because the virtual interface was never deleted from
OVS-DB and when the system boots again there's like an old reference
to the virtual interface that provoke this behavior.
Have anyone had this problem?, how did you solve it?, what your
suggestion for me?.
Looking at the manpages, I'll try another patch for libvirt that will
delete the interface with the flag --if-exists before adding it back
on libvirt start of the VM so, if the OVS-DB already has the
interface, it is deleted. If this works, do you think it's a good
solution?, or should it be implemented in other ways?.
Thanks for all and excuse my english but it's not my native language.
Ernesto