[forwarding my answer back to the list]
Pasquale, please keep the discussion on the list, you should probably
use the "Reply To All" (or whatever GMail calls it) button when
answering.
At Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:09:31 +0200,
Claudio Bley wrote:
[Remember /not/ to top-post on technical lists.]
At Mon, 7 Apr 2014 20:28:28 +0200,
Pasquale Dir wrote:
>
> Hello,
> is it ok if I'll send multiple patches for each added function? I'd start
> with the getCPUStats which is the most complex as it introduces new jna
> types too.
Yes, that would be a good start. (although I'd probably do it in
reverse, starting out with the small changes, then tackling the
complex ones).
> As for Thread.sleep() is it ok to substitute it with a wait(long) ? Or you
> have any alternative? That wait is needed for the alghoritm to work.
I'm not convinced that this functionality belongs into the library at
all. Maybe we could add a convenience method doing the computation
for two given stats and a time period, but I don't feel strongly in
support of adding this method.
Regards,
Claudio