[forwarding my answer back to the list] Pasquale, please keep the discussion on the list, you should probably use the "Reply To All" (or whatever GMail calls it) button when answering. At Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:09:31 +0200, Claudio Bley wrote:
[Remember /not/ to top-post on technical lists.]
At Mon, 7 Apr 2014 20:28:28 +0200, Pasquale Dir wrote:
Hello, is it ok if I'll send multiple patches for each added function? I'd start with the getCPUStats which is the most complex as it introduces new jna types too.
Yes, that would be a good start. (although I'd probably do it in reverse, starting out with the small changes, then tackling the complex ones).
As for Thread.sleep() is it ok to substitute it with a wait(long) ? Or you have any alternative? That wait is needed for the alghoritm to work.
I'm not convinced that this functionality belongs into the library at all. Maybe we could add a convenience method doing the computation for two given stats and a time period, but I don't feel strongly in support of adding this method.
Regards, Claudio