[forwarding my answer back to the list] Pasquale, please keep the discussion on the list, you should probably use the "Reply To All" (or whatever GMail calls it) button when answering. At Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:09:31 +0200, Claudio Bley wrote:

[Remember /not/ to top-post on technical lists.]

At Mon, 7 Apr 2014 20:28:28 +0200, Pasquale Dir wrote:

...

Hello, is it ok if I'll send multiple patches for each added function? I'd start with the getCPUStats which is the most complex as it introduces new jna types too.

Yes, that would be a good start. (although I'd probably do it in reverse, starting out with the small changes, then tackling the complex ones).

...

As for Thread.sleep() is it ok to substitute it with a wait(long) ? Or you have any alternative? That wait is needed for the alghoritm to work.

I'm not convinced that this functionality belongs into the library at all. Maybe we could add a convenience method doing the computation for two given stats and a time period, but I don't feel strongly in support of adding this method.

Regards, Claudio