
On 03/30/2012 12:53 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
There are a number of flaws with our packaging of the libvirtd daemon:
- Installing 'libvirt' does not install 'qemu-kvm' or 'xen' etc which are required to actually run the hypervisor in question - Installing 'libvirt' pulls in the default configuration files which may not be wanted & cause problems if installed inside a guest - It is not possible to explicitly required all the peices required to manage a specific hypervisor
This change takes the 'libvirt' RPM and and changes it thus
- libvirt: just a virtual package with dep on libvirt-daemon, libvirt-daemon-config-network & libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter - libvirt-daemon: the libvirt daemon and related pieces - libvirt-daemon-config-network: the default network config - libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter: the network filter configs - libvirt-docs: the website HTML
We then introduce some more virtual (empty) packages
- libvirt-daemon-qemu: Deps on libvirt-daemon & 'qemu' - libvirt-daemon-kvm: Deps on libvirt-daemon & 'qemu-kvm' - libvirt-daemon-lxc: Deps on libvirt-daemon - libvirt-daemon-uml: Deps on libvirt-daemon - libvirt-daemon-xen: Deps on libvirt-daemon & 'xen'
- libvirt-qemu: Deps on libvirt-daemon-qemu & libvirt-daemon-config-{network,nwfilter} - libvirt-kvm: Deps on libvirt-daemon-kvm & libvirt-daemon-config-{network,nwfilter} - libvirt-lxc: Deps on libvirt-daemon-lxc & libvirt-daemon-config-{network,nwfilter} - libvirt-uml: Deps on libvirt-daemon-uml & libvirt-daemon-config-{network,nwfilter} - libvirt-xen: Deps on libvirt-daemon-xen & libvirt-daemon-config-network
My intent in the future is to turn on the driver modules by default, at which time 'libvirt-daemon' will cease to include any specific drivers, instead we'll get libvirt-daemon-driver-XXXX packages for each driver. The libvirt-daemon-XXX packages will then pull in each driver that they require.
It is recommended that applications required a locally installed libvirtd daemon, use either 'Requires: libvirt-daemon-XXXX' or 'Requires: libvirt-XXX' and *not* "Requires: libvirt-daemon" or 'Requires: libvirt'
I did a successful "make rpm" on Fedora 16, which resulted in 21 rpm's (including the source rpm). When I tried to update using rpm -U, I was told that I didn't have the required "qemu" and "xen" packages installed (not surprising, since I never use them). Installing qemu cost 52MB on my disk, and xen another 27. This isn't a bother to me, but I suppose it could be for someone who was trying to make images as small as possible. On the other hand, that person will just need to start using the "libvirt-kvm" package instead of "libvirt". I guess the only concern I have left is whether or not this change in package grouping will create any unsavory situations when somebody upgrades. (there are a few lines in the docs that are still > 80 characters (for some reason, all of them end in "binaries")). Beyond that, it all looks good to me and I'm willing to give my ACK for what it's worth, but I think it would be a "very good idea" to have it looked over by someone with a better knowledge of specfiles than mine.