Re: [Libvir] [RFC] Add Container support to libvirt

DL> Would init or boot make sense in this case as well? I'm open to DL> changing it as long as it makes sense to everyone. I think that "init" is a widely-recognized term for the master process in a given process namespace. I would also think that, at least from a libvirt perspective, most people would be interested in having an init-like process structure within their containers. Thus, I would vote for using <init> over <boot> or <application>. -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center Open Hypervisor Team email: danms(a)us.ibm.com