[libvirt-users] Convincing libvirt to create a bridge device?

I was hoping that I could delegate creation of bridge devices to libvirt for address-less bridges, in order to not have to deal with the various ways distributions handle persistent network configuration, but while this creates a libvirt network... <network> <name>provision</name> <forward mode='bridge'/> <bridge name='brprov'/> </network> ...it doesn't actually create the bridge. Configuring the bridge using either <forward mode="route"/> or <forward mode="nat"/> *will* create the bridge device, but both of these require assigning an address to the bridge which means I have to suddenly worry about IPAM and conflicts with local networks. I look at the various interface-related commands, and there is an "iface-bridge" command but this requires a physical interface. Is there any way to convince libvirt to create the bridge device for a <forward mode='bridge'/> network? -- Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars(a)redhat.com&gt; | larsks @ {freenode,twitter,github} Cloud Engineering / OpenStack | http://blog.oddbit.com/