[libvirt] Follow-up on .so version number question

Eric posted this a while back (ref: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-April/msg00226.html) without any apparent response/discussion. Can someone please elaborate on this? Thanks, Tony

On 07/07/2014 12:35 PM, Tony Asleson wrote:
Eric posted this a while back (ref: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-April/msg00226.html) without any apparent response/discussion.
Can someone please elaborate on this?
At this point, we really aren't too worried about libtool versioning scheme. We've kept our guarantee of library back-compat ever since that email, with no complaints, so I'm not sure that changing anything now makes any sense (I'm more worried about breaking status quo than I am about violating libtool documentation suggestions) -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
participants (2)
-
Eric Blake
-
Tony Asleson