On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:51:33AM +0200, Philippe Berthault wrote: Okay, agreed but I don't see how we could change the interface now. I guess in such a case, one should ignore the node informations, put 1 and provide the number of sockets for the whole machine. Since there is no way to do node assignment anyway in the API, the best is to allow the user space to see the right number of core available. Note you may get the same kind of problem say by mixing 2 and 4 core processors on a single node, I still think homogeneous setups are by large the more frequents. But you are right there is a limitation there, it should however not be too problemeatic, I don't expect people would use that call to try to guess topology of the underlying boxes. Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/