On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:41:38PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:34:36PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:38:20AM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
>>> We already are checking for negative value, reporting an error, but
>>> using wrong function, so the check never succeeds. This patch provides
>>
>> Actually it could succeed, for example with queues="asdf" or
"3d" it
>> would return a -1. So I reworded it a bit.
>>
>>> just a minor change in call of the right version of function
>>> virStrToLong.
>>>
>>> Resolves:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138539
>>> ---
>>> src/conf/domain_conf.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>>> index a2a7d92..42b8973 100644
>>> --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>>> +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>>> @@ -7374,7 +7374,7 @@ virDomainNetDefParseXML(virDomainXMLOptionPtr
>>> xmlopt,
>>> }
>>> if (queues) {
>>> unsigned int q;
>>> - if (virStrToLong_ui(queues, NULL, 10, &q) < 0) {
>>> + if (virStrToLong_uip(queues, NULL, 10, &q) < 0) {
>>> virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_DETAIL,
>>> _("'queues' attribute must be
>>> positive number: %s"),
>>> queues);
>>> --
>>> 1.9.3
>>>
>>
>> ACK && Pushed,
>>
>
> Well, I should've said that having a test for that can show that it
> works properly. It should be named *-invalid.xml and that will make
> schema tests check whether the RNG schema fits as well. That would be
> a great follow-up! ;-)
>
Sorry for spamming, but I just realized that I haven't pushed it yet,
so I'm reverting my ACK and please add the tests and make sure that
RNG schema fits.
Thanks,
Martin
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list