11:40 a.m.
Thanks Guannan:
https://github.com/autotest/autotest/commit/ba4b748e7b9a9bfe7898a97cdccdc...
Cheers,
Lucas
11:33 p.m.
On 03/09/2012 01:40 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
Thanks Guannan:
https://github.com/autotest/autotest/commit/ba4b748e7b9a9bfe7898a97cdccdc...
Cheers,
Lucas
That's great, thank Lucas.
This is the initial version, we need to maintain it later on.
If that, the patch will be sent to autotest mainling list, is that
right?
Guannan Ren
2:28 a.m.
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:33:48PM +0800, Guannan Ren wrote:
On 03/09/2012 01:40 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
>Thanks Guannan:
>
>https://github.com/autotest/autotest/commit/ba4b748e7b9a9bfe7898a97cdccdc9b867d5321c
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>Lucas
That's great, thank Lucas.
yes excellent to both of you :-) yay !!!
This is the initial version, we need to maintain it later on.
If that, the patch will be sent to autotest mainling list, is
that right?
Yes I would think that's the normal place (for now).
The very first thing I would suggest is to get a new TCK release as
the one referenced is realy ancient :
-rw-r--r-- 1 berrange www 40996 Jul 22 2009 Sys-Virt-TCK-0.1.0.tar.gz
We should try to iron out possible issues when running the TCK from
autotest, then make a new release, put it on ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/tck/
and update the upstream autotest with it.
The other thing is to also add libvirt-test-API to autotest:
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt-test-API.git;a=summary
Guannan made a first patch for it:
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=autotest.git;a=commit;h=a4203c516530a81166c5f95...
I don't think it was submitted yet to autotest(a)test.kernel.org,
Lucas do you think that's ready ?
thanks !
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
2:49 a.m.
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:28:47PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:33:48PM +0800, Guannan Ren wrote:
> On 03/09/2012 01:40 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> >Thanks Guannan:
> >
>
>https://github.com/autotest/autotest/commit/ba4b748e7b9a9bfe7898a97cdccdc9b867d5321c
> >
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Lucas
>
> That's great, thank Lucas.
yes excellent to both of you :-) yay !!!
> This is the initial version, we need to maintain it later on.
> If that, the patch will be sent to autotest mainling list, is
> that right?
Yes I would think that's the normal place (for now).
The very first thing I would suggest is to get a new TCK release as
the one referenced is realy ancient :
-rw-r--r-- 1 berrange www 40996 Jul 22 2009 Sys-Virt-TCK-0.1.0.tar.gz
We should try to iron out possible issues when running the TCK from
autotest, then make a new release, put it on ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/tck/
and update the upstream autotest with it.
Yes, my bad. We should fix libvirt and/or the TCK so that it passes,
and then cut a new release.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
2:59 a.m.
On 03/09/2012 04:28 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:33:48PM +0800, Guannan Ren wrote:
> On 03/09/2012 01:40 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
>> Thanks Guannan:
>>
>>
https://github.com/autotest/autotest/commit/ba4b748e7b9a9bfe7898a97cdccdc...
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Lucas
> That's great, thank Lucas.
yes excellent to both of you :-) yay !!!
> This is the initial version, we need to maintain it later on.
> If that, the patch will be sent to autotest mainling list, is
> that right?
Yes I would think that's the normal place (for now).
The very first thing I would suggest is to get a new TCK release as
the one referenced is realy ancient :
-rw-r--r-- 1 berrange www 40996 Jul 22 2009 Sys-Virt-TCK-0.1.0.tar.gz
We should try to iron out possible issues when running the TCK from
autotest, then make a new release, put it on ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/tck/
and update the upstream autotest with it.
The other thing is to also add libvirt-test-API to autotest:
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt-test-API.git;a=summary
Guannan made a first patch for it:
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=autotest.git;a=commit;h=a4203c516530a81166c5f95...
libvirt-test-API now is being used by testing work of some cloud
products based on
libvirt such as OpenShift as far as I know.
If that is added into autotest, that would be good for both of
autotest and libvirt testing
Guannan Ren
4:52 a.m.
On 2012年03月09日 16:59, Guannan Ren wrote:
On 03/09/2012 04:28 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:33:48PM +0800, Guannan Ren wrote:
>> On 03/09/2012 01:40 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
>>> Thanks Guannan:
>>>
>>>
https://github.com/autotest/autotest/commit/ba4b748e7b9a9bfe7898a97cdccdc...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Lucas
>> That's great, thank Lucas.
> yes excellent to both of you :-) yay !!!
>
>> This is the initial version, we need to maintain it later on.
>> If that, the patch will be sent to autotest mainling list, is
>> that right?
> Yes I would think that's the normal place (for now).
> The very first thing I would suggest is to get a new TCK release as
> the one referenced is realy ancient :
> -rw-r--r-- 1 berrange www 40996 Jul 22 2009 Sys-Virt-TCK-0.1.0.tar.gz
> We should try to iron out possible issues when running the TCK from
> autotest, then make a new release, put it on
> ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/tck/
> and update the upstream autotest with it.
>
> The other thing is to also add libvirt-test-API to autotest:
> http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt-test-API.git;a=summary
> Guannan made a first patch for it:
>
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=autotest.git;a=commit;h=a4203c516530a81166c5f95...
>
>
libvirt-test-API now is being used by testing work of some cloud
products based on
libvirt such as OpenShift as far as I know.
Sounds good news, any proof (uri)?
Osier
5 a.m.
On 03/09/2012 06:52 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 2012年03月09日 16:59, Guannan Ren wrote:
> On 03/09/2012 04:28 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:33:48PM +0800, Guannan Ren wrote:
>>> On 03/09/2012 01:40 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
>>>> Thanks Guannan:
>>>>
>>>>
https://github.com/autotest/autotest/commit/ba4b748e7b9a9bfe7898a97cdccdc...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Lucas
>>> That's great, thank Lucas.
>> yes excellent to both of you :-) yay !!!
>>
>>> This is the initial version, we need to maintain it later on.
>>> If that, the patch will be sent to autotest mainling list, is
>>> that right?
>> Yes I would think that's the normal place (for now).
>> The very first thing I would suggest is to get a new TCK release as
>> the one referenced is realy ancient :
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 berrange www 40996 Jul 22 2009 Sys-Virt-TCK-0.1.0.tar.gz
>> We should try to iron out possible issues when running the TCK from
>> autotest, then make a new release, put it on
>> ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/tck/
>> and update the upstream autotest with it.
>>
>> The other thing is to also add libvirt-test-API to autotest:
>> http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt-test-API.git;a=summary
>> Guannan made a first patch for it:
>>
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=autotest.git;a=commit;h=a4203c516530a81166c5f95...
>>
>>
>>
>
> libvirt-test-API now is being used by testing work of some cloud
> products based on
> libvirt such as OpenShift as far as I know.
Sounds good news, any proof (uri)?
Actually, test-API will be used by
SAM(Subscription Asset Management)
project from HSS QE team, they have been developing their test suite
currently, hope it'll be launched soon.
cc'ing khong, who's responsible for that, correct me if I'm wrong.
Rita
Osier
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
4672
days inactive
4676
days old
6 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Daniel P. Berrange -
Daniel Veillard -
Guannan Ren -
Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues -
Osier Yang -
Rita Wu