[libvirt] Release planning suggestions for next releases
I just checked and we have "only" 63 commits since 1.0.0 was released, so even if we were to increase the rate dramatically next week, it doesn't look like there is a high pressure for a release at the end of the month. Taking into account the extra factors that end of December is usually low traffic, and that I'm trying to take real vacations first week of December (nearly no internet access), I think we could slightly change the two next release schedules to accomodate those: - push 1.0.1 mid-December - push 1.0.2 at the end of January Did I miss a reason to not delay the push of 1.0.1 and keep it at the end of the month ? Or other problems with this plan ? Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat veillard@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> wrote:
I just checked and we have "only" 63 commits since 1.0.0 was released, so even if we were to increase the rate dramatically next week, it doesn't look like there is a high pressure for a release at the end of the month. Taking into account the extra factors that end of December is usually low traffic, and that I'm trying to take real vacations first week of December (nearly no internet access), I think we could slightly change the two next release schedules to accomodate those: - push 1.0.1 mid-December - push 1.0.2 at the end of January
Did I miss a reason to not delay the push of 1.0.1 and keep it at the end of the month ? Or other problems with this plan ?
Daniel
I like the idea of the adjusted schedule. It would allow me time to finish up some pending work and get it reviewed and committed since I'm going on vacation as well. -- Doug Goldstein
participants (2)
-
Daniel Veillard -
Doug Goldstein