On 04/14/2011 12:52 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
> Should we also minimize the truncation by adding just
"-n" instead of
> "-nic", so that there are fewer user strings being butchered? Or would
> that cause problems for existing users that already have bridge-nic and
> would now also have bridge-n?
So, is this minor artifact worth getting the extra two characters?
I'll
let the patch sit until midday, and if someone comes out in support of
changing it, I'll reduce the suffix to "-n" and push, otherwise I'll
push as-is.
I can live with the patch as-is, if no one else speaks for the two extra
characters.
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org