Hey, Reading this patch, I'm wondering if gvir_domain_set_config might achieve what you are after (it's not implemented either) On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 09:24:32PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@gnome.org>
--- libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-connection.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-connection.h | 4 +++ libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject.sym | 1 + 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-connection.c b/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-connection.c index 6c8de11..471c795 100644 --- a/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-connection.c +++ b/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-connection.c @@ -1201,6 +1201,43 @@ GVirDomain *gvir_connection_create_domain(GVirConnection *conn, }
/** + * gvir_connection_redefine_domain: + * @conn: the connection on which the dmain exists + * @conf: the new configuration for the domain + * + * Redefines an existing domain. + */ +void gvir_connection_redefine_domain(GVirConnection *conn, + GVirDomain *domain, + GVirConfigDomain *conf, + GError **err)
For the record, I'm not sure I like the naming here.
+{ + const gchar *xml; + virDomainPtr handle; + GVirDomain *dom; + virDomainPtr dom_handle;
This is unused
+ GVirConnectionPrivate *priv = conn->priv; + + xml = gvir_config_object_to_xml(GVIR_CONFIG_OBJECT(conf)); + + g_return_if_fail(xml != NULL); + + g_mutex_lock(priv->lock); + dom = g_hash_table_lookup (priv->domains, + (gpointer)gvir_domain_get_uuid(domain)); + g_mutex_unlock(priv->lock); + g_return_if_fail(dom != NULL); + /* FIXME: Check if config's domain ID is the same as domain passed */ + + if (!(handle = virDomainDefineXML(priv->conn, xml))) {
Shouldn't handle be assigned to some persistent state? My guess is domain->priv->handle. Christophe