Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/6] bhyve: virBhyveProbeCaps: BHYVE_CAP_LPC_BOOTROM
On 08.03.2017 18:19, Michal Privoznik wrote:
ACK, but we really need a better way to detect capabilites. For
instance
now, bhyve binary is executed 4 times just to find out whether it
supports 4 capabilities. That's just madness. Maybe we can get in touch
with bhyve developers and ask them? Maybe it could have a monitor just
like qemu has, or something.
There's a patch[1] for it, but it would need to be
moved along.
Unfortunately, we would still need to somehow fall back to this for
backwards compatibility...
Fabian
[1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210111
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?