On 07/26/2017 05:00 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
Add the blockstats data and fix the expected output.
---
...mumonitorjson-nodename-relative-blockstats.json | 329 +++++++++++++++++++++
...umonitorjson-nodename-relative-named-nodes.json | 26 +-
.../qemumonitorjson-nodename-relative.result | 44 ++-
tests/qemumonitorjsontest.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 372 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
tests/qemumonitorjsondata/qemumonitorjson-nodename-relative-blockstats.json
+++
b/tests/qemumonitorjsondata/qemumonitorjson-nodename-relative-named-nodes.json
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
},
"iops_wr": 0,
"ro": false,
- "node-name": "#block1177",
+ "node-name": "#block1290",
Hmm - here you created one extra node in the regeneration in comparison
to how you set it up previously. Not fatal to the patch, though.
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com>
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:
qemu.org |
libvirt.org