On 07/26/2017 05:00 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
Add the blockstats data and fix the expected output. --- ...mumonitorjson-nodename-relative-blockstats.json | 329 +++++++++++++++++++++ ...umonitorjson-nodename-relative-named-nodes.json | 26 +- .../qemumonitorjson-nodename-relative.result | 44 ++- tests/qemumonitorjsontest.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 372 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tests/qemumonitorjsondata/qemumonitorjson-nodename-relative-blockstats.json
+++ b/tests/qemumonitorjsondata/qemumonitorjson-nodename-relative-named-nodes.json @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ }, "iops_wr": 0, "ro": false, - "node-name": "#block1177", + "node-name": "#block1290",
Hmm - here you created one extra node in the regeneration in comparison to how you set it up previously. Not fatal to the patch, though. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org