On 10/12/2018 10:27 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
[...]
> 402 virResctrlMonitorDispose(void *obj)
> 403 {
> 404 virResctrlMonitorPtr monitor = obj;
> 405
> 406 virObjectUnref(monitor->alloc);
> 407 VIR_FREE(monitor->id);
> 408 VIR_FREE(monitor->path);
> 409 }
>> The one "thing" about the order of patches
here is that it forces me to
>> look forward to ensure decisions made in previous patches will be
>> handled in the future.
> Maybe combine virResctrlMonitorDispose and virResctrlMonitorCreate in one
> patch? Will that make you look better for understanding how @monitor->alloc
> is used.
That usually is best. I think the order has me off a bit too,
but there
is no perfect solution for order. I find myself looking forward a lot
and trying to keep track.
I'll change the order of the series to fix this.
John
Thanks for review.
Huaqiang