Re: [Libvir] Remote patch, 2007-02-28
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 11:25 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> So far, the release model for libvirt (correct me if I'm wrong) has been
> that you periodically bundle up the latest version of libvirt and put it
> on the website. There's no experimental branch where we can place
> things like a libvirt remote patch with the proviso that at some point
> later we can say "sorry, that didn't work".
I'd be happy to see this stuff in CVS on a "remote branch", but it
would be quite a pain for you to maintain a branch in CVS.
It's probably about the same work that I'm doing now - periodically
pulling in CVS commits into git and resolving conflicts (there usually
aren't many, and so far none have been complex).
But yes, really I was talking about what the libvirt policy is / should
be on experimental stuff.
Rich.
--
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
64 Baker Street, London, W1U 7DF Mobile: +44 7866 314 421
"[Negative numbers] darken the very whole doctrines of the equations
and make dark of the things which are in their nature excessively
obvious and simple" (Francis Maseres FRS, mathematician, 1759)
Attachments:
- smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature — 3.2 KB)