On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 23:06:47 +0200
Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy(a)linux.ibm.com> wrote:
On 4/15/20 12:51 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> +zPCI addresses
> +==============
> +
> +For s390x machines, PCI addresses are handled yet differently. No
> +topology information is relayed in the PCI addresses; instead, the
> +``fid`` and ``uid`` elements of the ``zpci`` device convey information.
Should it be mentioned that qemu uses the pci address internally to plug
the device into its pci bus since the pci address as far as I know must
still be properly provided or generated.
Not sure how much is autogenerated; however, as this document talks
about how pci addresses in the xml translate to pci addresses in the
guest, I think we can simply ignore it?
> +In the simplest case, the following XML snippet
> +
> +::
> +
> + <controller type='pci' index='0'
model='pci-root'/>
> + <controller type='pci' index='1'
model='pci-bridge'>
> + <model name='pci-bridge'/>
> + <target chassisNr='1'/>
> + <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00'
slot='0x01' function='0x0'>
> + <zpci uid='0x0002' fid='0x00000001'/>
> + </address>
> + </controller>
> + <interface type='bridge'>
> + <mac address='02:ca:fe:fa:ce:04'/>
> + <source bridge='virbr0'/>
> + <model type='virtio'/>
> + <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x01'
slot='0x01' function='0x0'>
> + <zpci uid='0x0001' fid='0x00000000'/>
> + </address>
> + </interface>
> +
> +will result in the following in a Linux guest::
> +
> + 0001:00:00.0 Ethernet controller: Red Hat, Inc. Virtio network device
> +
> +Note that the PCI bridge is not visible in the guest; s390x always has a flat
> +topology.
> +
> +Neither are any changes in the PCI address visible in the guest; replacing
> +the PCI address for the virtio-net device with
> +
> +::
> +
> + <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x01'
slot='0x07' function='0x3'>
> +
> +will result in the exactly same view in the guest, as the addresses there
> +are generated from the information provided via the ``zpci`` element (in
> +fact, from the ``uid``).
> +
This explains that the uid is used by the guest to define the pci domain
of the guest device.
How about an addition for the fid? Something like:
The function id 'fid' defines the slot address of the pci card in the
guest. It can be observed in the guest at /sys/bus/pci/slots. In the
example given above the card would be at /sys/bus/pci/slots/00000000.
Hm, is it intentional that this does not show up in the actual pci
address? But maybe I'm confused.
> +Therefore, replacing the virtio-net device definition with the following XML
> +snippet
> +
> +::
> +
> + <interface type='bridge'>
> + <mac address='02:ca:fe:fa:ce:04'/>
> + <source bridge='virbr0'/>
> + <model type='virtio'/>
> + <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x01'
slot='0x07' function='0x3'>
> + <zpci uid='0x0007' fid='0x00000003'/>
> + </address>
> + </interface>
> +
> +will yield the following result in a Linux guest::
> +
> + 0007:00:00.0 Ethernet controller: Red Hat, Inc. Virtio network device
>
and the card would be at /sys/bus/pci/slots/00000003.
Do you want to explain the fid/slot stuff in a patch on top? Despite
your attempts at time travel, this patch has already been pushed :)