On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 21:13:54 +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 20:21:19 +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 09:29:50 +0100
> Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
We consume machine types as opaque strings, we don't parse them and thus
we don't have any ordering on them. Without this telling what <= 4.0
means is impossible. And I don't think we should start doing it, and
especially not for limiting this hack as it would be limiting a hack
with another one.
A reasonable solution would be if we could tell which machine types need
(or perhaps don't need) such treatment by probing QEMU for available
machine types.
Well this has two implications:
1) qemu telling us would be detectable, thus no need to check for x-something
2) if qemu can tell us when to use it, it's very probable that at that
point it can do the correct thing itself, not requiring anything from
us