On 01/23/2012 05:03 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> > > The qemu32/qemu64 models are weird in that the
exact combination of
>> > > CPUID flags does not match any actual processor. kvm32 and kvm64
are
>> > > a better match when not using TCG. Use them when -cpu is only
needed
>> > > to hardcode a 32-bit guest arch or for kvmclock.
> >
> > I don't think we can do this as it means the guest CPU may change
unexpectedly
> > for existing domains. A 32b domain started on current libvirt would see
qemu32,
> > while the same domain started after this patch would see kvm32.
Also, IIUC, kvm32 is a fairly newly introduced CPU type for KVM - ie most
deployments of KVM won't support it.
Ok, I'll redo this patch with just kvm64. As the wrong subject in 0/3
show, it was an afterthought.
As soon as I get the review of 3/4, I'll see whether I need to resubmit
the whole series or just this patch.
Paolo