Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 02.04.2014 10:30, Wojciech Macek wrote:
> Adding one minor change to copyrights header...
>
>
>
> - Move all capabilities functions to separate file
> - Add initCPU
> ---
> src/Makefile.am | 2 +
> src/bhyve/bhyve_capabilities.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> +++++++++++
> src/bhyve/bhyve_capabilities.h | 30 ++++++++++++
> src/bhyve/bhyve_driver.c | 56 +++++++++++++---------
> 4 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 src/bhyve/bhyve_capabilities.c
> create mode 100644 src/bhyve/bhyve_capabilities.h
This is not the best way to send patch as reply. I see you've used git
send-email to send the previous patches. If you want to send a v2 just
to a specific one (say 2/3), you should use git send-email too; just
specify in-reply-to and adjust subject prefix: PATCHv2: ....
Moreover, sending patches other way than git send-email is tricky as you
need to make sure the lines are not wrapped (yes, it happened in this
case too).
And for minor changes I think it's easier to just command so the person
who will be pushing that could just squash that in instead of
re-applying the series.
As for the copyright change, I think, technically, I should be on a list
for bhyve_capabilities.c as well because it still contains some of the
code I previously wrote :-)
Can you resend the v2? It's okay to send v2 just to a single
patch.
Agreed, and v2 would be useful for another reason: I wasn't able to
apply this patch, git am gives me:
fatal: sha1 information is lacking or useless (src/bhyve/bhyve_driver.c).
I'd guess it reference some non-published or changed commit?
Thanks,
Roman Bogorodskiy