On 04/15/2016 06:41 AM, Cole Robinson wrote:
Libvirt currently rejects using host /dev/urandom as an input source for a virtio-rng device. The only accepted sources are /dev/random and /dev/hwrng. This is the result of discussions on qemu-devel around when the feature was first added (2013). Examples:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-09/msg02387.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-03/threads.html#00023
libvirt's rejection of /dev/urandom has generated some complaints from users:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074464 * cited: http://www.2uo.de/myths-about-urandom/ http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-March/msg01062.html http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-April/msg00186.html
I think it's worth having another discussion about this, at least with a recent argument in one place so we can put it to bed. I'm CCing a bunch of people. I think the questions are:
1) is the original recommendation to never use virtio-rng+/dev/urandom correct?
2) regardless of #1, should we continue to reject that config in libvirt?
Even though there's still a debate about whether use of /dev/urandom here is sensible, several people suggested removing the libvirt path restriction, and nobody really spoke up to defend it. So I've posted a patch to fully drop libvirt's rng path whitelist: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-April/msg01362.html - Cole