On 08/08/2013 02:43 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
Each of the modules handled reporting error messages from the secret
fetching
slightly differently with respect to the error. Provide a similar message
for each error case and provide as much data as possible.
---
src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
src/storage/storage_backend_iscsi.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
...
diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend_iscsi.c
b/src/storage/storage_backend_iscsi.c
index ee8dd2e..55bf544 100644
--- a/src/storage/storage_backend_iscsi.c
+++ b/src/storage/storage_backend_iscsi.c
@@ -732,15 +732,31 @@ virStorageBackendISCSISetAuth(const char *portal,
conn->secretDriver->secretGetValue(secret, &secret_size, 0,
VIR_SECRET_GET_VALUE_INTERNAL_CALL);
if (!secret_value) {
- virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
- _("could not get the value of the secret "
- "for username %s"), chap.username);
+ if (chap.secret.uuidUsable) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
+ _("could not get the value of the secret "
+ "for username %s using uuid '%s'"),
+ chap.username, chap.secret.uuid);
+ } else {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
+ _("could not get the value of the secret "
+ "for username %s using usage value
'%s'"),
+ chap.username, chap.secret.usage);
This looks to me like the username plays a part in getting the secret value,
but I'm not sure how to rephrase it while still keeping the username there.
+ }
goto cleanup;
}
} else {
- virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
- _("username '%s' specified but secret not
found"),
- chap.username);
+ if (chap.secret.uuidUsable) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_NO_SECRET,
+ _("username '%s' specified but the secret for
"
+ "uuid '%s' not found"),
+ chap.username, chap.secret.uuid);
+ } else {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_NO_SECRET,
+ _("username '%s' specified but the secret for
"
+ "usage value '%s' not found"),
+ chap.username, chap.secret.usage);
+ }
goto cleanup;
With VIR_ERR_NO_SECRET, this says "secret not found" twice:
error: Secret not found: username 'nahasapeemapetilon' specified but the
secret for usage value 'pwagmattasquarmsettport' not found
But that's minor. Maybe "... but no secret matches usage '%s'"?
}
diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c b/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
index e3340f6..9c6d179 100644
--- a/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
+++ b/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c
...
- secret_value = conn->secretDriver->secretGetValue(secret,
&secret_value_size, 0,
+ secret_value = conn->secretDriver->secretGetValue(secret,
+ &secret_value_size, 0,
VIR_SECRET_GET_VALUE_INTERNAL_CALL);
Unrelated whitespace change.
ACK if you separate it from the rest of the patch.
Jan