On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 09:58 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 05/18/2016 07:53 AM, Cole Robinson wrote:
>
> Kind of. Prior to patch #2, the test suite output was correct (no addresses),
> it's what we were returning via domxml-from-native. After patch #2, the test
> suite output was wrong for all real world usage; it didn't change because it
> was only hitting a !QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE code path
>
> So the potentially contentious bit is that patch #2 changes domxml-from-native
> output to contain addresses, however that's exactly the same result that will
> happen when the XML would eventually be defined anyways, so it's effectively
> the same result as pre-patch #2 anyways. If we think of domxml-from-native as
> telling the user 'this is exactly what libvirt thinks that command line is'
> then we are now giving more accurate results
>
> Let me know if that still warrants the ACK
My opinion is that this is a change for the better. While it is true
that this could lead to XML that potentially shows different PCI
addresses than what would have been auto-assigned by qemu when presented
with the original commandline, it *is* showing the addresses that would
be auto-allocated by libvirt if you had fed the "un-addressified" XML to
libvirt - so at least the user will get a warning rather than being
surprised at runtime. And it's not as if the output of
domxml-from-native has ever produced anything even close to the correct
XML in any real world situation. (dreadkopp in public #virt pastebin'ed
an example last night - 90% of it was translated directly into
<qemu:arg> elements).
After reading Cole's explanation, I tend to agree.
So I guess we can go ahead and merge this, as well as 5/4 :)
--
Andrea Bolognani
Software Engineer - Virtualization Team