Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv7 5/9] blockjob: make drive-reopen safer

Il 16/09/2012 01:53, Eric Blake ha scritto:

This is only a problem for the RHEL 6.3 drive-reopen command; which partly explains why upstream qemu 1.3 abandoned that command and went with block-job-complete instead.

Not really true, in fact it's worse with block-job-complete because it's asynchronous and can take longer. However, for QEMU 1.3 we'll provide a persistent dirty bitmap that will let you catch this when restarting libvirt. Paolo