At 2016-08-08 23:19:26, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 05:00:38PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> while wiring qemu-ga into libvirt I've noticed that it has ability to
> spawn commands inside guest. I haven't paid much attention to it then as
> implementing libvirt <-> qemu-ga communication was more important. But
> lately couple of requests on the list showed up where ability to spawn
> various commands inside guests would be much appreciated (e.g. when
> fetching some stats that HV can't know or has no support for yet -
> free/df/..).
>
I never really liked the qemu guest agent ability to run arbitrary commands.
It is basically re-inventing the shell but with really awful features. eg the
having to provide all the input upfront, not having any way to stream large
stdout/stderr data back to the host.
Further, from a security POV it is really bad practice to have this feature
in QEMU guest agent, as it makes it impossible to provide any kind of sane
security confinment for the GA. IIRC, default Fedora SELinux policy will not
even permit the exec command to be to used. Most of the QEMU GA commands have
very tight scope so are easily confined, but 'exec' by its very nature wants
todo anything. From that POV, a general purpose exec facility is really better
suited to a separate command.
Users could ban it inside VM by blacklist.
Also, with default SELinux policy, qga could not do anything more.
So it's under control.
Also from an API modelling POV, exposing the guest agent exec in libvirt
is pretty much giving up on any sense of API design. It'll just discourage
anyone from ever writing any further special case guest agent commands
with formal APIs.
IOW, I don't think we should ever expose the qemu guest agent exec command
via libvirt APIs.
We've had qemuAgentCommand.
So I think it's better for a new public API.
Regards,
- Chen