2010/12/23 Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com>:
Rather than tying the element name to our current choice of program,
can
we come up with something more generic?
<network>
<name>xxxnet</name>
<ipv4routing>/usr/local/bin/my-dnsmasq</ipv4routing>
<ipv6routing>/usr/local/bin/my-radvd</ipv6routing>
</network>
But the idea of allowing the XML to specify an override for the program
to run seems like it might be worthwhile.
I don't think <ipv[46]routing> are the best names, because it goes
rather about tuning settings for DNS/DHCP (or NDP for ipv6) or
starting additional services per started network and not setting
routing.
Temporary ignoring the naming I prepared following patch:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-December/msg01052.html
What do you think?
--
Pawel