On 09/30/2011 12:22 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
The next patch wants to add some sanity checking, which would
be a different error than ENOMEM. Many existing callers blindly
report OOM failure if virBuf reports an error, and this will be
wrong in the (unlikely) case that they actually had a usage error
instead; but since the most common error really is ENOMEM, I'm
not going to fix all callers. Meanwhile, new discriminating
callers can react differently depending on what failure happened.
* src/util/buf.c (virBufferSetError): Add parameter.
(virBufferGrow, virBufferVasprintf, virBufferEscapeString)
(virBufferEscapeSexpr): Adjust callers.
---
src/util/buf.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
I checked this patch, it seems everything is all right.