On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 06:52:22AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 04/02/2013 01:42 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
> ---
> src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 +
> src/util/virbitmap.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> src/util/virbitmap.h | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
Since there already is a "virBitmapIsAllSet()" - why isn't it used? I
see callers which do "if (virBitmapIsAllSet(...)" and "if
(!virBitmapIsAllSet(...)".
If you're going to have a AllClear(), then why not change those !
callers to use AllClear()...
!virBitmapIsAllSet() is not the same as virBitmapIsAllClear().
!virBitmapIsAllSet() allows for [0 -> (n-1)] bits to be set,
whereas virBitmapIsAllClear() only allows for 0 bits to be
set.
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|