On 04/13/2011 11:55 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
The solution is to shorten the part of the original name used to
generate the tap device name. However, simply truncating it is
insufficient, because the last few characters of an interface name are
often a number used to indicate one of a list of several similar
devices (for example, "verylongname123", "verylongname124", etc) and
simple truncation would lead to duplicate names. So instead we take
the first 8 characters of $bridgename ("verylong" in the example), add
on the final 3 bytes ("123"), then add "-nic" (so
"verylong123-nic").
Not pretty, but it is much more likely to generate a unique name, and
is reproducible (unlike, say, a random number).
Should we also minimize the truncation by adding just "-n" instead of
"-nic", so that there are fewer user strings being butchered? Or would
that cause problems for existing users that already have bridge-nic and
would now also have bridge-n?
- virAsprintf(&nicname, "%s-nic", brname);
+ if (strlen(brname) > (IFNAMSIZ - 5)) {
+ /* because the length of an ifname is limited to IFNAMSIZ-1
+ * (usually 15), and we're adding 4 more characters, we must
+ * truncate the original name to 11 to fit. In order to catch
+ * a possible numeric ending (eg virbr0, virbr1, etc), we grab
+ * the first 8 and last 3 characters of the string.
+ */
+ virAsprintf(&nicname, "%.*s%s-nic",
+ IFNAMSIZ - 8, /* space for last 3 chars + "-nic" + NULL
*/
+ brname, brname + strlen(brname) - 3);
+ } else {
+ virAsprintf(&nicname, "%s-nic", brname);
+ }
ACK.
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org