On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 08:30:50AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607202
It's essentially stated in the nwfilterBindingDelete that we
will allow the admin to shoot themselves in the foot by deleting
the nwfilter binding which then allows them to undefine the
nwfilter that is in use for the running guest...
However, by allowing this we cause a problem for libvirtd
restart reconnect processing which would then try to recreate
the missing binding attempting to use the deleted filter
resulting in an error and thus shutting the guest down.
So rather than keep adding virDomainConfNWFilterInstantiate
flags to "ignore" specific error conditions and since (so far)
this is the only path that cared about checking if the filter
already exists and ignoring, let's just ignore all errors and
make the qemuProcessFiltersInstantiate be a void which will
attempt to check all networks for bindings and reload all filters
that exist. Using the VIR_INFO in order to at least "log" the
avoided issue.
This also means virDomainConfNWFilterInstantiate no longer
needs to handle/check the ignoreExists possbility.
Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
---
v1:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-August/msg01407.html
Changes - removed the ignoreExists and just change the logic for
reconnect processing to essentially ignore all errors. If it's felt
the VIR_INFO would be too chatty (especially since it'll be generated
for every already defined filter binding), I can remove it. Another
option would be to keep the ignoreExists logic and only generate that
VIR_INFO for "other" messages. In that case, I'd probably want to change
it to a VIR_WARN. Still figured I'd post the remove it all option first
for consideration with this caveat so that "option" can be considered
as well.
I guess the difference with 'ignore exists' is that this situation is
harmless. The binding is still active and thus network traffic is
confined.
In the other error scenarios, the failure indicates a problem that
likely means the network traffic is not confined.
So it probably makes sense to keep the ignoreExists flag and use
VIR_WARN for other errors.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|