On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 11:59:31 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com> ---
[...]
+foreach name : keyname_list + rst_file = custom_target( + 'virkeyname-@0@.rst'.format(name), + input: keymap_src_file, + output: 'virkeyname-@0@.rst'.format(name), + command: [ + meson_python_prog, python3_prog, keymap_gen_prog, 'name-docs', + '--lang', 'rst', + '--title', 'virkeyname-@0@'.format(name), + '--subtitle', 'Key name values for @0@'.format(name), + '@INPUT@', name, + ], + capture: true, + build_by_default: true, + ) + + docs_man_files += { + 'name': 'virkeyname-@0@'.format(name), 'section': '7', 'install': true, 'file': rst_file, + } +endforeach + +docs_man_conf = configuration_data() +docs_man_conf.set('SYSCONFDIR', sysconfdir) +docs_man_conf.set('RUNSTATEDIR', runstatedir) + +foreach data : docs_man_files + rst_in_file = '@0@.rst.in'.format(data['name']) + html_in_file = '@0@.html.in'.format(data['name']) + html_file = '@0@.html'.format(data['name']) + + if data.has_key('file') + rst_file = data['file'] + else + rst_file = configure_file( + input: rst_in_file, + output: '@0@.rst'.format(data['name']), + configuration: docs_man_conf, + ) + endif
I must say it feels weird process these through configure_file. Also it's super weird that they've overloaded 3 modes into configure_file. What's the difference to generator() by the way, since we use it for rst->html conversion? I'd expect that we could use configure_file there or generator here then. Also is there a possibility where the input and output file will have the same name? I'm not very fond of the .rst.in files.