[Libvir] Re: Fedora spec file changes
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:23:09PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey,
First thing - libvirt.spec has previously matched the spec file we've
used in Fedora for building packages, but now it's quite a bit out of
sync.
My question is whether libvirt.spec should be upstream at all:
1) Having the two copies is confusing - which is canonical?
2) Keeping the two copies in sync is time consuming, especially if
they're not going to be exactly identical.
3) It's not clear that it's useful to have it upstream at all - i.e.
is it useful anywhere but Fedora? Are iscsi-initiator-utils or
selinux-devel valid RPM names on any other distro?
We also use in the nightly builds
Dan.
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|