On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:57:11PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
For a long timer we've had the ability to build each libvirt
driver as a loadable module. We have never used this by default
and as a result it constantly bit-rots.
This series fixes various bugs, and then enables it by default
in configure. It also makes the PRMs use the loadable modules,
adding new new sub-RPMs for each module. We can now finally
install minimal libvirt binaries for each hypervisor.
ie yum install libvirt-kvm
will not pull in Xen libraries!
Okay, I understand the principle, and this sounds good. I'm sorry
for not having caught up the RPM server refactoring patch earlier, I
would have discussed that scenario, and would have avoided me reverting
your patch (I really dislike doing this, I guess that was the first
time I ever did this) but this was IMHO too much change and too early.
I completely agree with the scenario of being able to do
yum install libvirt-kvm
and have libvirt daemon, the bits for the daemon qemu/kvm support,
and related configuration files being pulled in, as well as hooking
up the hypervisor dependency. But to me that means one specific
libvirt-kvm package (tied to the daemon anyway the client should
be agnostic about it), not two !
We should aim at minimizing the number of actual packages while
still providing the needed modularization. So I would expect:
- libvirt (the server and its basic config file)
- libvirt-client (as usual)
- libvirt-kvm (can we merge -kvm and -qemu ?)
- libvirt-xen
- libvirt-lxc
- libvirt-uml
- libvirt-network (our default network config)
- libvirt-devel (as usual)
- libvirt-lock-sanlock (as usual)
- libvirt-python (as usual)
for a separate split of the documentation currently in the -devel package
I'm not so sure it's worth changing but I don't have a strong opinion
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/