On a Wednesday in 2022, Michal Privoznik wrote:
My commit of v6.9.0-rc1~457 was a bit too harsh. While it served
its purpose (adding usb-host.hostdevice capability) it has a side
effect: because I copied reply from qemu-5.1.0 to older .replies
files one might now think that say qemu-3.1.0 supports both
.guest-reset and .guest-resets-all properties. But in fact it
doesn't. There are three problematic properties:
1) guest-reset, introduced in v4.0.0-rc0~56^2
2) guest-resets-all introduced in v4.2.0-rc1~9^2
3) suppress-remote-wake introduced in v5.0.0-rc0~148^2~4
Remove these properties from versions that could not have had
them.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
---
.../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_3.1.0.ppc64.replies | 15 ---------------
.../caps_3.1.0.x86_64.replies | 15 ---------------
.../caps_4.0.0.aarch64.replies | 10 ----------
.../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_4.0.0.ppc64.replies | 10 ----------
.../caps_4.0.0.riscv32.replies | 10 ----------
.../caps_4.0.0.riscv64.replies | 10 ----------
.../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_4.0.0.s390x.replies | 10 ----------
.../caps_4.0.0.x86_64.replies | 10 ----------
.../caps_4.1.0.x86_64.replies | 10 ----------
.../caps_4.2.0.aarch64.replies | 5 -----
.../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_4.2.0.ppc64.replies | 5 -----
.../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_4.2.0.s390x.replies | 5 -----
.../caps_4.2.0.x86_64.replies | 5 -----
13 files changed, 120 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko(a)redhat.com>
Jano