$SUBJ: s/upsupported/unsupported
On 05/05/2015 02:03 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
We have previously effectively ignored all <controller
type='ide'>
elements in a domain definition.
On the i440fx-based machinetypes there is an IDE controller that is
included in the chipset and can't be removed (which is the ide
controller with index='0'>), so it makes sense to ignore that one
controller. However, if an i440fx domain has a 2nd controller, nothing
catches this error (unless you also have a disk attached to it, in
which case qemu will complain that you're trying to use the ide
controller named "ide1", which doesn't exist), and if any other type
of domain has even a single controller defined, it will be incorrectly
ignored.
Ignoring a bogus controller definition isn't such a big problem, as
long as an error is logged when any disk is attached to that
non-existent controller. But in the case of q35-based machinetypes,
the hardcoded id ("alias" in libvirt terms) of its builtin SATA
controller is "ide", which happens to be the same id as the builtin
IDE controller on i440fx machinetypes. So libvirt creates a
commandline believing that it is connecting the disk to the builtin
(but actually nonexistent) IDE controller, qemu thinks that libvirt
wanted that disk connected to the builtin SATA controller, and
everybody is happy.
Until you try to connect a 2nd disk to the IDE controller. Then qemu
will complain that you're trying to set unit=1 on a controller that
requires unit=0 (SATA controllers are organized differently than IDE
controllers).
libvirt should really be saying what it means, and meaning what it
says, and that's what this patch does - after this patch, if a domain
has an IDE controller defined for a machinetype that has no IDE
controllers, libvirt will log an error about the controller itself as
it is building the qemu commandline (rather than a (possible) error
from qemu about disks attached to that controller). This is done by
rearranging the loop that creates controller command strings in
qemuBuildCommandline() so that it also calls
qemuBuildControllerDevStr() for IDE controllers unless it is the
primary controller on an i440fx machine (previously it would *always*
skip IDE controllers). Then qemuBuildControllerDevStr() is modified to
log an appropriate error in the case of IDE controllers.
In the future, if we add support for extra IDE controllers (piix3-ide
and/or piix4-ide) we can just add it into the IDE case in
qemuBuildControllerDevStr(). For now, nobody seems anxious to add
extra support for an aging and very slow controller, when there are so
many better options available.
(note that the body of the controller loop in qemuBuildCommandline()
was cleaned up in the process to eliminate duplicated code, but other
than the addition of calling qemuBuildControllerDevStr() for IDE, it
is functionally unchanged).
---
src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 101 ++++++++++++---------
.../qemuxml2argv-disk-blockio.args | 2 +-
.../qemuxml2argvdata/qemuxml2argv-disk-blockio.xml | 1 -
.../qemuxml2argv-disk-ide-drive-split.args | 2 +-
.../qemuxml2argv-disk-ide-drive-split.xml | 1 -
.../qemuxml2argv-disk-source-pool-mode.args | 2 +-
.../qemuxml2argv-disk-source-pool-mode.xml | 1 -
.../qemuxml2argv-disk-source-pool.args | 2 +-
.../qemuxml2argv-disk-source-pool.xml | 1 -
.../qemuxml2xmlout-disk-source-pool.xml | 1 -
10 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
I'd say a "soft" ACK - things seem OK to me... Rules are defined, the
commit message is very descriptive, code motion for QEMU_CAPS_ICH9_AHCI,
and enforcing IDE rules What scares me most is the unknown of what
havoc or misconfigurations are "out there"... TBH: I close my eyes and
hope this code works ;-)...
Hopefully another set of eyes can look as well!
John